Heeffer, Albrecht. 2011. “Historical Objections Against The Number Line”. Science and Education 20: 863–880.

Froeyman, Anton. 2011. “Historische Uitvoeringspraktijk”. De uil van minerva 24: 21–38.

Urbaniak, Rafal. 2011. “How Not To Use The Church-Turing Thesis Against Platonism”. Philosophia Mathematica 19: 74–89.

Heeffer, Albrecht. 2011. “Hypocrisie Binnen De Wiskunde?”. Wiskunde & onderwijs 148: 306–315.

Leuridan, Bert, and Erik Weber. 2011. “The Iarc And Mechanistic Evidence” Phyllis McKay Illari, Russo, Federica, and Williamson, Jon. Causality in the Sciences: 91–109.

van Eck, Dingmar. 2011. “Incommensurability And Rationality In Engineering Design: The Case Of Functional Decomposition”. SOCIETY FOR PHILOSOPHY & TECHNOLOGY QUARTERLY ELECTRONIC JOURNAL 15: 118–136.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, Erik Weber, and Leen De Vreese. 2011. “Indispensability Arguments In Favour Of Reductive Explanations”. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 42: 33–46.

Kosolosky, Laszlo. 2011. “The Intended Window Of Epistemic Opportunity: A Comment On Miriam Solomon” Bart Van Kerkhove, Libert, Thierry, Vanpaemel, Geert, and Marage, Pierre. Logic, Philosophy and History of Science in Belgium II.

Ducheyne, Steffen. 2011. “Kant And Whewell On Bridging Principles Between Metaphysics And Science”. Kant Studien 102: 22–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/KANT.2011.002.

Batens, Diderik. 2011. “Logics For Qualitative Inductive Generalization”. Studia Logica 97: 61–80.

De Mol, Liesbeth. 2011. “Looking For Busy Beavers. A Socio-Philosophical Study Of A Computer-Assisted Proof” Karen François, Löwe, Benedikt, Müller, Thomas, and Van Kerkhove, Bart. Foundations of the Formal Sciences: 61–90.

Primiero, Giuseppe. 2011. Intuitionistic Modal Logic and Applications Workshop (IMLA11), Nancy A Multi-Modal Type System And Its Procedural Semantics For Safe Distributed Programming.

Primiero, Giuseppe. 2011. “On The Necessity Of (Sometimes) Being Synthetic. Comment On Poggiolesi.” Patrick Allo and Primiero, Giuseppe. Third Workshop in the Philosophy of Information: 63-68.

De Saeger, David, and Erik Weber. 2011. “Needham's Grand Question Revisited: On The Meaning And Justification Of Causal Claims In The History Of Chinese Science”. East Asian Science, Technology and Medicine 33: 13–32.

Beirlaen, Mathieu, and Christian Straßer. 2011. “A Paraconsistent Multi-Agent Framework For Dealing With Normative Conflicts” Joao Leite, Torroni, Paolo, Agotnes, Thomas, Boella, Guido, and van der Torre, Leon. 12th International Workshop on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems (CLIMA XII): 312-329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22359-4.

Drouet, Isabelle. 2011. “Propensities And Conditional Probabilities”. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 52: 153–165.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2011. “Proto-Regress Argument Schemas”. ISSA 2010 Proceedings: 2000–2007.

Allo, Patrick, and Giuseppe Primiero. 2011. “Report 3Rd Workshop In The Philosophy Of Information”. The Reasoner 1: 6-7.

Heeffer, Albrecht. 2011. “The Rhetoric Of Problems In Algebra Textbooks From Pacioli To Euler”.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2011. “Rules Regresses”. AGPC 2010 Proceedings: 79–92. http://www.illc.uva.nl/agpc/agpc10/.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2011. “The Sceptic's Tools: Circularity And Infinite Regress”. Philosophical Papers 40: 359–369.

Verdée, Peter. 2011. “Strong Paraconsistency By Separating Composition And Decomposition In Classical Logic”. In WoLLIC 2011 Proceedings LNAI Series, WoLLIC 2011 Proceedings LNAI Series, R Goebel. Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20920-8\_26.

van Eck, Dingmar. 2011. “Supporting Design Knowledge Exchange By Converting Models Of Functional Decomposition”. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN 22: 839–858. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2011.603692.

Ducheyne, Steffen. 2011. “Testing Universal Gravitation In The Laboratory, Or The Significance Of Research On The Mean Density Of The Earth And Big G, 1798-1898: Changing Pursuits And Long-Term Methodological-Experimental Continuity”. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 65: 181–227.

Leuridan, Bert. 2011. “Three Problems For The Mutual Manipulability Account Of Constitutive Relevance In Mechanisms”. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63: 399–427.