@article {leuridan2011three,
	title = {Three problems for the mutual manipulability account of constitutive relevance in mechanisms},
	journal = {The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science},
	volume = {63},
	number = {2},
	year = {2011},
	pages = {399{\textendash}427},
	abstract = {<p>In this article, I present two conceptual problems for Craver{\textquoteright}s mutual manipulability account of constitutive relevance in mechanisms. First, constitutive relevance threatens to imply causal relevance despite Craver (and Bechtel){\textquoteright}s claim that they are strictly distinct. Second, if (as is intuitively appealing) parthood is defined in terms of spatio-temporal inclusion, then the mutual manipulability account is prone to counterexamples, as I show by a case of endosymbiosis. I also present a methodological problem (a case of experimental underdetermination) and formulate two partial, but fallible solutions based on the notions of parthood and synchronicity.</p>},
	doi = {10.1093/bjps/axr036},
	author = {Leuridan, Bert}
}
