Vanderbeeken, Robrecht. 2003. “Een Pluralisme Van Verklaringen Van Acties”.

Batens, Diderik. 1989. “Een Pleidooi Voor Lokale Consistentie” H. Berghs and Thys, W. Congresbundel Filosofiedag Antwerpen 1988: 41–46.

Batens, Diderik. 1996. “Een Ontroerend Intens Streven Naar Kennis, Naar Beleving En Naar De Eenheid Van Beide” Diderik Batens. Leo Apostel. Tien filosofen getuigen: 135–157.

Vanderbeeken, Robrecht, and Gertrudis Van de Vijver. 2007. “Een Maat En Veel Gewichten. Repliek Op De Proefvlucht Van Buekens”. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 99: 211–221.

Haesaert, Lieven. 2002. “Een Adaptieve Logica Voor Het Beschrijven Van Inductie”. In Handelingen van de 24ste Nederlands-Vlaamse Filosofiedag: Filosofie en Empirie, Handelingen van de 24ste Nederlands-Vlaamse Filosofiedag: Filosofie en Empirie, Universiteit Amsterdam.

Weber, Erik. 1998. “Editorial Preface.”. Logique et analyse 41: 269–270.

Kosolosky, Laszlo. 2014. “Editorial And Interview With Justin Biddle”. The Reasoner 8: 47–50.

Meheus, Joke. 1999. “The Early Positivists' Approach To Scientific Discovery”. Philosophica 64: 81–108.

Van De Putte, Frederik, and Peter Verdée. 2012. “The Dynamics Of Relevance: Adaptive Belief Revision”. Synthese 187: 1-42.

Van Dyck, Maarten. 2009. “Dynamics Of Reason And The Kantian Project”. Philosophy of Science 76: 389–400.

Batens, Diderik. 1998. “A Dynamic Semantics For Inconsistency-Adaptive Logics”. Bulletin of the Section of Logic 27: 15–18.

Batens, Diderik. 1998. “Dynamic Semantics Applied To Inconsistency-Adaptive Logics”. Logical Investigations 5: 74–85.

Batens, Diderik. 1985. “Dynamic Dialectical Logics As A Tool To Deal With And Partly Eliminate Unexpected Inconsistencies” Jaakko Hintikka and Vandamme, Fernand. The Logic of Discovery and the Logic of Discourse: 263–271.

Batens, Diderik. 1989. “Dynamic Dialectical Logics” Graham Priest, Routley, Richard, and Norman, Jean. Paraconsistent Logic. Essays on the Inconsistent: 187–217.

Straßer, Christian, and Ofer Arieli. 2014. “Dynamic Derivations For Sequent-Based Deductive Argumentation” Simon Parsons, Oren, Nir, Reed, Chris, and Cerutti, Federico. COMMA 2014 Computational Models of Argument: 89–100.

Batens, Diderik. 2001. “A Dynamic Characterization Of The Pure Logic Of Relevant Implication”. Journal of Philosophical Logic 30: 267-280.

Heeffer, Albrecht. In Press. “Dutch Algebra And Arithmetic In Japan Before The Meiji Restoration” I.M. Vandoulakis and Dun, Liu. Navigating across Mathematical Cultures and Times: Exploring the Diversity of Discoveries and Proofs.

De Mey, Tim. 2003. “The Dual Nature Of Thought Experiments”. Philosophica 72: 61–78.

Urbaniak, Rafal. 2009. “Doxastic Synonymy Vs. Logical Equivalence”. The Reasoner 3: 5-6.

Claes, Tom. 2012. Door Denken En Doen: Essays Bij Het Werk Van Ronald Commers. Academia Press.

Van De Putte, Frederik, Allard Tamminga, and Hein Duijf. 2017. “Doing Without Nature”. In Logic, Rationality, and Interaction (LORI), Logic, Rationality, and Interaction (LORI), Sapporro: Springer.

De Mol, Liesbeth. 2009. “Doing Mathematics On The Eniac. Von Neumann's And Lehmer's Different Visions”. In Mathematical Practice and Development throughout History. Proceedings of the 18th Novembertagung on the History, Philosophy and Didactics of Mathematics, Mathematical Practice and Development throughout History. Proceedings of the 18th Novembertagung on the History, Philosophy and Didactics of Mathematics, Ingo Witzke and Wilhelmus, E. Logos Verlag Berlin.

Meheus, Joke. 2003. “Do We Need Paraconsistency In Commonsense Reasoning?” Claudio Delrieux and Legris, Javier. Computer Modeling of Scientific Reasoning: 135–146.

Batens, Diderik. 1992. “Do We Need A Hierarchical Model Of Science?” John Earman. Inference, Explanation, and Other Frustrations. Essays in the Philosophy of Science: 199–215.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2019. “Do Mechanism-Based Social Explanations Make A Case For Methodological Individualism?”. JOURNAL FOR GENERAL PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE 50: 263–282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10838-019-09446-w.