Publications
“Pooling Modalities And Pointwise Intersection: Axiomatization And Decidability”. Studia Logica online first.
. 2020. “Adaptive Deontic Logics”. Handbook of Deontic Logic and Normative Systems 2.
. In Press. . Submitted.
“Hierarchic Adaptive Logics”. Logic Journal of the IGPL 20: 45–72.
. 2011. “Coarse Deontic Logic”. Journal of Logic and Computation.
. In Press. “The Dynamics Of Relevance: Adaptive Belief Revision”. Synthese 187: 1-42.
. 2012. “Adaptive Logics: A Parametric Approach”. Logic Journal of the IGPL 22: 905-932. + http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzu017.
. 2014. “Adaptive Deontic Logics: A Survey”. IfCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications 6: 523-608. http://www.collegepublications.co.uk/downloads/ifcolog00032.pdf.
. 2019. “Splitting And Relevance: Broadening The Scope Of Parikh's Concepts”. Logique et Analyse 59(234): 173 -205.
. 2016. “Coarse Deontic Logic (Short Version)”. In Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, College Publications.
. 2016. “Extending The Standard Format Of Adaptive Logics To The Prioritized Case”. Logique et Analyse 55: 601–641.
. 2012. “When Unveiling The Epistemic Fallacy Ends With Committing The Ontological Fallacy. On The Contribution Of Critical Realism To The Social Scientific Explanatory Practice”. Philosophica 71: 81–98.
. 2003. “The Problem With(Out) Consensus: The Scientific Consensus, Deliberative Democracy And Agonistic Pluralism.” . The social sciences and democracy: 121–142.
. 2009. “Towards A Framework For Pluralisms In Economics”. Post-Autistic Economics Review 30: 24–27.
. 2005. “De-Ontologizing The Debate On Social Explanations: A Pragmatic Approach Based On Epistemic Interests.”. Human Studies 31: 423–442.
. 2008. “Participation Beyond Consensus? Technology Assessments, Consensus Conferences And Democratic Modulation. ”. Social Epistemology 31 (6).
. 2017. “Understanding In Political Science: The Plurality Of Epistemic Interests” . Scientific Understanding. Philosophical Perspectives: 298–313.
. 2009. “Towards Democratic Models Of Science: Exploring The Case Of Scientific Pluralism”. Perspectives on science 23: 149–172.
. 2015. “The Consequences Of Scientific Pluralism For Science Policy”. In Proceedings of V Jornadas Latinoamericanas de estudios sociales de la ciencia y de la tecnología, Proceedings of V Jornadas Latinoamericanas de estudios sociales de la ciencia y de la tecnología,.
. 2004. “Subject Ingebed? Over Het Methodologisch Individualisme In De Sociale Wetenschappen.” . De terugkeer van het subject? Recente Ontwikkelingen binnen de filosofie: 169–179.
. 2002. “Heeft Er Iemand Een Wetenschapsbeleid Gezien? Over Wetenschap, Democratie En De Onderzoeksagenda”. Samenleving en politiek 12: 12–18. http://www.stichtinggerritkreveld.be/ECMS\_CLIENT/configuration/pages/artikel.php?aid=307.
. 2005. “A Pragmatist Defense Of Non-Relativistic Explanatory Pluralism In History And Social Science.”. History and theory 47: 168–182.
. 2008.