de Amo, Sandra, Walter A Carnielli, and João Marcos. 2002. “A Logical Framework For Integrating Inconsistent Information In Multiple Databases” Thomas Eiter and Schewe, Klaus-Dieter. Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems 2284: 67-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45758-5_5.

Vanackere, Guido. 2002. “Ontological Causes Of Inconsistency And A Change-Adaptive, Logical Solution” Walter A Carnielli, Coniglio, Marcelo E, and D'Ottaviano, Itala MLoffred. Paraconsistency. The Logical Way to the Inconsistent 228: 151–166.

Batens, Diderik. 2002. “On A Partial Decision Method For Dynamic Proofs” Hendrik Dekker, Villadsen, Jorgen, and Waragai, Toshiharu. PCL 2002. Paraconsistent Computational Logic 95: 91–108. http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.LO/0207090.

De Mey, Tim. 2002. “Qualia, Spectruminversie En Filosofische Zombies.” Reynaert J P. Leilich and Veldeman, J. Het bewustzijn in de fysische wereld: Filosofische essays over materialisme en fenomenaal bewustzijn: 171-194.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Erik Weber. 2002. “Remote Causes, Bad Explanations?”. The Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 32: 437-449.

Batens, Diderik. 2002. “Some Computational Aspects Of Inconsistency-Adaptive Logics”. CLE e-Prints 2: 15 pp.

Batens, Diderik. 2002. “On Some Remarkable Relations Between Paraconsistent Logics, Modal Logics, And Ambiguity Logics” Walter A Carnielli, Coniglio, Marcelo E, and D'Ottaviano, Itala MLoffred. Paraconsistency. The Logical Way to the Inconsistent: 275–293.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Barbara Verdonck. 2002. “Subject Ingebed? Over Het Methodologisch Individualisme In De Sociale Wetenschappen.” Rob Devos and Braeckman, Antoon. De terugkeer van het subject? Recente Ontwikkelingen binnen de filosofie: 169–179.

Weber, Erik, and Jeroen Van Bouwel. 2002. “Symposium On Explanation And Social Ontology 3: Can We Dispense With Structural Explanations Of Social Facts?”. Economics and Philosophy 18: 259–275.

De Mey, Tim. 2002. “Thought Experiments, Conceivability Arguments And Conceptual Blending”. Odense Working Papers in Language and Communication 24: 143–156.

Weber, Erik, and Maarten Van Dyck. 2002. “Unification And Explanation - A Comment On Halonen And Hintikka, And Schurz.”. Synthese 131: 145–154.

Weber, Erik, and Kristof De Clercq. 2002. “Why The Logic Of Explanation Is Inconsistency-Adaptive.” Joke Meheus. Inconsistency in science: 165–184.

Weber, Erik, and Maarten Van Dyck. 2001. “Adaptive Logic And Covering Law Explanations”. Logique et Analyse 44: 237–254.

Meheus, Joke. 2001. “Adaptive Logics For Question Evocation”. Logique et Analyse 44: 135–164.

Verhoeven, Liza. 2001. “All Premises Are Equal, But Some Are More Equal Than Others.”. Logique et Analyse 44: 165–188.

Batens, Diderik. 2001. Aspects Of The Dynamics Of Discussions And Logics Handling Them.

Batens, Diderik, and Lieven Haesaert. 2001. “On Classical Adaptive Logics Of Induction”. Logique et Analyse 44: 255–290.

Christiaens, Wim. 2001. “De Cirkel Sluiten. Aanzet Tot Een Wetenschappelijke Metafysica”.

Batens, Diderik. 2001. “A Dynamic Characterization Of The Pure Logic Of Relevant Implication”. Journal of Philosophical Logic 30: 267-280.

Carnielli, Walter A, and João Marcos. 2001. “Ex Contradictione Non Sequitur Quodlibet”. In Proceedings of the 2000 Advanced Reasoning Forum Conference, Proceedings of the 2000 Advanced Reasoning Forum Conference,.

Batens, Diderik. 2001. “A General Characterization Of Adaptive Logics”. Logique et Analyse 44: 45–68.

Batens, Diderik, and Joke Meheus. 2001. “On The Logic And Pragmatics Of The Process Of Explanation” Mika Kiikeri and Ylikoski, Petri. Explanatory Connections. Electronic Essays Dedicated to Matti Sintonen. http://www.valt.helsinki.fi/kfil/matti/.

Caleiro, Carlos, and João Marcos. 2001. “Non-Truth-Functional Fibred Semantics” Hamid R Arabnia. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IC-AI'2001) 2: 841–847.

Batens, Diderik. 2001. “Over De Zin Van Het Leven En De Zingevende Functie Van Wereldbeelden”. Mores 226: 41–63.

Weber, Erik, and Robrecht Vanderbeeken. 2001. “A Pragmatic Approach To The Explanation Of Actions” Jörg Blasius, Hox, J., de Leeuw, E., and Schmidt, P. Social Science Methodology in the New Millenium.