@article {152661,
	title = {Unification and explanation - {A} comment on {H}alonen and {H}intikka, and {S}churz.},
	journal = {Synthese},
	volume = {131},
	number = {1},
	year = {2002},
	pages = {145{\textendash}154},
	abstract = {<p>In this article we criticize two recent articles that examine the relation between explanation and unification. Halonen and Hintikka (1999), on the one hand, claim that no unification is explanation. Schurz (1999), on the other hand, claims that all explanation is unification. We give counterexamples to both claims. We propose a pluralistic approach to the problem: explanation sometimes consists in unification, but in other cases different kinds of explanation (e.g., causal explanation) are required; and none of these kinds is more fundamental.</p>},
	issn = {0039-7857},
	doi = {10.1023/A:1015005529380},
	author = {Weber, Erik and Van Dyck, Maarten}
}
