Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2006. “The Division Of Labour In The Social Sciences Versus The Politics Of Metaphysics. Questioning Critical Realism's Interdisciplinarity”. Graduate Journal of Social Science 2: 32–39.

De Langhe, Rogier. 2010. “The Division Of Labour In Science: The Tradeoff Between Specialisation And Diversity”. Journal of Economic Methodology 17: 37–51. http://logica.ugent.be/rogier/jemfinal.pdf.

De Winter, Jan. 2010. “The Distorted Research Agenda In The Health Sciences And James Robert Brown’S Policy Proposal.”. In Logic, Philosophy and History of Science in Belgium II, Logic, Philosophy and History of Science in Belgium II, Bart Van Kerkhove, Libert, Thierry, Vanpaemel, Geert, and Marage, Pierre. Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van België. http://logica.ugent.be/centrum/preprints/De_Winter_(2012)_-_Brown.pdf.

Vanderbeeken, Robrecht. 2008. “Dispositions Pace Armstrong.” Tim De Mey and Keinänen, Markku. Problems from Armstrong 84: 127–154.

Vanderbeeken, Robrecht, and Erik Weber. 2002. “Dispositional Explanations Of Behavior.”. Behavior and Philosophy 30: 43–59.

De Mey, Tim. 2008. “Disjunctive Realism About Color” Tim De Mey and Keinänen, Markku. Problems from Armstrong 84: 193–200.

De Vreese, Leen. 2010. “Disentangling Causal Pluralism” Robrecht Vanderbeeken and D'Hooghe, Bart. Worldviews, Science and Us. Studies of Analytical Metaphysics.: 207–223.

Meheus, Joke. 2006. “Discussive Adaptive Logics: Handling Internal And External Inconsistencies” Jacek Malinowski and Pietruszczak, Andrzej. Essays in Logic and Ontology 91: 211-223.

Batens, Diderik, and Timothy Vermeir. 2002. “Direct Dynamic Proofs For The Rescher–Manor Consequence Relations: The Flat Case”. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 12: 63–84.

Provijn, Dagmar. 2003. “Direct Dynamic Proofs For Compatibility.” Claudio Delrieux and Legris, Javier. Computer modeling of scientific reasoning: 179–187.

Meheus, Joke, and Dagmar Provijn. 2004. “Direct Dynamic Proofs For Classical Compatibility”. Logique et Analyse 47: 305–317.

Batens, Diderik. 1986. “Dialectical Dynamics Within Formal Logics”. Logique et Analyse 29: 161–173.

Batens, Diderik. 2006. “A Diagrammatic Proof Search Procedure As Part Of A Formal Approach To Problem Solving” Lorenzo Magnani. Model Based Reasoning in Science and Engineering. Cognitive Science, Epistemology, Logic: 265–284.

Batens, Diderik. 2020. “Devising The Set Of Abnormalities For A Given Defeasible Rule”. Logicheskie Issledovaniya / Logical Investigations 26: 9–35. https://logicalinvestigations.ru/article/view/557/561?lang=en.

Batens, Diderik. 1994. “Determinisme En Indeterminisme” Frans Verbeure and Apostel, Leo. Verwijdering of ontmoeting?: 183–202.

Drouet, Isabelle. 2009. “Is Determinism More Favorable Than Indeterminism For The Causal Markov Condition?”. Philosophy of Science 76: 662–675. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/605797.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Erik Weber. 2008. “De-Ontologizing The Debate On Social Explanations: A Pragmatic Approach Based On Epistemic Interests.”. Human Studies 31: 423–442.

Straßer, Christian, Joke Meheus, and Aleks Knoks. Submitted. “Deontic Reasoning On The Basis Of Consistency Considerations”.

Faroldi, Federico LG. 2019. “Deontic Modals And Hyperintensionality”. Logic Journal of the IGPL.

Straßer, Christian. 2009. “A Deontic Logic Framework Allowing For Factual Detachment –- Appendix”. Journal of Applied Logic 9: 61–80.

Straßer, Christian. 2010. “A Deontic Logic Framework Allowing For Factual Detachment”. Journal of applied logic 9: 61–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2010.11.001.

Verdée, Peter. Submitted. “Degrees Of Inconsistency. Carefully Combining Classical And Paraconsistent Negation.”.

Weber, Erik. 1996. “Default Reasoning In The Correction Of Falsified System Descriptions”. Logique et Analyse 37: 13–22.

Van De Putte, Frederik. 2013. “Default Assumptions And Selection Functions: A Generic Framework For Non-Monotonic Logics”. Proceedings of MICAI2013, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 8264: 54-67.

Meheus, Joke. 1999. “Deductive And Ampliative Adaptive Logics As Tools In The Study Of Creativity”. Foundations of Science 4: 325–336.