<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Batens, Diderik</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vermeir, Timothy</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Direct Dynamic Proofs For the Rescher–Manor Consequence Relations: The Flat Case</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2002</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">63–84</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;It was shown in \cite{D:unific} that the flat Rescher–Manor consequence relations–-the Free, Strong, Argued, C-Based, and Weak consequence relation–-are all characterized by special applications of inconsistency-adaptive logics defined from the paraconsistent logic &lt;strong&gt;CLuN&lt;/strong&gt;. As as result, these consequence relations are provided with a dynamic proof theory. In the present paper we show that the detour via an inconsistency-adaptive logic is not necessary. We present a &lt;em&gt;direct&lt;/em&gt; dynamic proof theory, formulated in the language of Classical Logic, and prove its adequacy.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record></records></xml>