De Clercq, Kristof, and Liza Verhoeven. 2004. “Sieving Out Relevant And Efficient Questions”. Logique et Analyse 47: 189–216.

Batens, Diderik. 2003. “Adaptieve Logica's. Een Precieze Benadering Van Vertrouwde Maar Door Logici Verwaarloosde Redeneervormen”. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 95: 174–189.

Urbaniak, Rafal. 2003. “Analysis Of Kotarbinski's Reistic Reasonings”. {Logiczne Podstawy Rozumowań 3: 62–81.

Vanackere, Guido. 2003. “Change In Individuals Without A Name. Contextual Indicators & The Free Change-Adaptive Logic”. Logic and Logical Philosophy 11: 213–230. http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2003.011.

Verhoeven, Liza. 2003. “Changing One's Position In Discussions - Some Adaptive Approaches”. Logic and Logical Philosophy 11/12: 277–297.

Batens, Diderik. 2003. “Criteria Causing Inconsistencies. General Gluts As Opposed To Negation Gluts”. Logic and Logical Philosophy 11/12: 5–37.

Provijn, Dagmar. 2003. “Direct Dynamic Proofs For Compatibility.” Claudio Delrieux and Legris, Javier. Computer modeling of scientific reasoning: 179–187.

Meheus, Joke. 2003. “Do We Need Paraconsistency In Commonsense Reasoning?” Claudio Delrieux and Legris, Javier. Computer Modeling of Scientific Reasoning: 135–146.

De Mey, Tim. 2003. “The Dual Nature Of Thought Experiments”. Philosophica 72: 61–78.

Vanderbeeken, Robrecht. 2003. “Een Pluralisme Van Verklaringen Van Acties”.

Christiaens, Wim. 2003. “The Epr-Experiment And Free Process Theory” Johanna Seibt. Process Theories. Cross-Disciplinary Studies on Dynamic Categories: 267-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1044-3_11.

Weber, Erik. 2003. “Explaining Laws By Reduction”. In Philosophical Dimensions of Logic and Science, Philosophical Dimensions of Logic and Science, A Rojsczak, Cachro, J, and Kurczewski, G. Dordrecht: Springer.

De Mey, Tim, and Erik Weber. 2003. “Explanation And Thought Experiments In History.”. History and Theory 42: 28–38.

Batens, Diderik. 2003. “A Formal Approach To Problem Solving” Claudio Delrieux and Legris, Javier. Computer Modeling of Scientific Reasoning: 15–26.

De Mey, Tim. 2003. “Hoe Geschiedenis Tot Lering Strekt”. Ethiek en Maatschappij 6: 47–54.

Meheus, Joke. 2003. “Inconsistencies And The Dynamics Of Science”. Logic and Logical Philosophy 11/12: 129–148.

Heeffer, Albrecht. 2003. “Kepler's Near Discovery Of The Sine Law: A Qualitative Computational Model.” Claudio Delrieux and Legris, Javier. Computer modeling of scientific reasoning: 93–102.

Christiaens, Wim. 2003. “Non-Spatiality And Epr-Experiments According To The Creation-Discovery View”. Foundations of Physics Letters 16: 379–387.

Christiaens, Wim. 2003. “A Note Concerning The Place Of Contradictions In The Ontologies Of Constitution”. Logic and Logical Philosophy 11/12: 67–72.

Meheus, Joke. 2003. “Paraconsistent Compatibility”. Logique et Analyse 46: 251–287.

Batens, Diderik. 2003. A Paraconsistent Proof Procedure Based On Classical Logic.

Vanderbeeken, Robrecht, and Kristof De Clercq. 2003. “A Procedure For Generating (Conditional) Answers In A Goal-Directed Way” Claudio Delrieux and Legris, Javier. Computer modeling of scientific reasoning: 57–63.

Verhoeven, Liza. 2003. “Proof Theories For Some Prioritized Consequence Relations”. Logique et Analyse 46: 325–344.

Van Dyck, Maarten. 2003. “The Roles Of One Thought Experiment In Interpreting Quantum Mechanics: Werner Heisenberg Meets Thomas Kuhn”. Philosophica 72: 79–103.

De Vreese, Leen, and Erik Weber. 2003. Searching For Singular Causal Explanations: A Formal Analysis.