Weber, Erik. 1996. “Default Reasoning In The Correction Of Falsified System Descriptions”. Logique et Analyse 37: 13–22.

Verdée, Peter. Submitted. “Degrees Of Inconsistency. Carefully Combining Classical And Paraconsistent Negation.”.

Straßer, Christian. 2010. “A Deontic Logic Framework Allowing For Factual Detachment”. Journal of applied logic 9: 61–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2010.11.001.

Straßer, Christian. 2009. “A Deontic Logic Framework Allowing For Factual Detachment –- Appendix”. Journal of Applied Logic 9: 61–80.

Faroldi, Federico LG. 2019. “Deontic Modals And Hyperintensionality”. Logic Journal of the IGPL.

Straßer, Christian, Joke Meheus, and Aleks Knoks. Submitted. “Deontic Reasoning On The Basis Of Consistency Considerations”.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Erik Weber. 2008. “De-Ontologizing The Debate On Social Explanations: A Pragmatic Approach Based On Epistemic Interests.”. Human Studies 31: 423–442.

Drouet, Isabelle. 2009. “Is Determinism More Favorable Than Indeterminism For The Causal Markov Condition?”. Philosophy of Science 76: 662–675. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/605797.

Batens, Diderik. 1994. “Determinisme En Indeterminisme” Frans Verbeure and Apostel, Leo. Verwijdering of ontmoeting?: 183–202.

Batens, Diderik. 2020. “Devising The Set Of Abnormalities For A Given Defeasible Rule”. Logicheskie Issledovaniya / Logical Investigations 26: 9–35. https://logicalinvestigations.ru/article/view/557/561?lang=en.

Batens, Diderik. 2006. “A Diagrammatic Proof Search Procedure As Part Of A Formal Approach To Problem Solving” Lorenzo Magnani. Model Based Reasoning in Science and Engineering. Cognitive Science, Epistemology, Logic: 265–284.

Batens, Diderik. 1986. “Dialectical Dynamics Within Formal Logics”. Logique et Analyse 29: 161–173.

Meheus, Joke, and Dagmar Provijn. 2004. “Direct Dynamic Proofs For Classical Compatibility”. Logique et Analyse 47: 305–317.

Provijn, Dagmar. 2003. “Direct Dynamic Proofs For Compatibility.” Claudio Delrieux and Legris, Javier. Computer modeling of scientific reasoning: 179–187.

Batens, Diderik, and Timothy Vermeir. 2002. “Direct Dynamic Proofs For The Rescher–Manor Consequence Relations: The Flat Case”. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 12: 63–84.

Meheus, Joke. 2006. “Discussive Adaptive Logics: Handling Internal And External Inconsistencies” Jacek Malinowski and Pietruszczak, Andrzej. Essays in Logic and Ontology 91: 211-223.

De Vreese, Leen. 2010. “Disentangling Causal Pluralism” Robrecht Vanderbeeken and D'Hooghe, Bart. Worldviews, Science and Us. Studies of Analytical Metaphysics.: 207–223.

De Mey, Tim. 2008. “Disjunctive Realism About Color” Tim De Mey and Keinänen, Markku. Problems from Armstrong 84: 193–200.

Vanderbeeken, Robrecht, and Erik Weber. 2002. “Dispositional Explanations Of Behavior.”. Behavior and Philosophy 30: 43–59.

Vanderbeeken, Robrecht. 2008. “Dispositions Pace Armstrong.” Tim De Mey and Keinänen, Markku. Problems from Armstrong 84: 127–154.

De Winter, Jan. 2010. “The Distorted Research Agenda In The Health Sciences And James Robert Brown’S Policy Proposal.”. In Logic, Philosophy and History of Science in Belgium II, Logic, Philosophy and History of Science in Belgium II, Bart Van Kerkhove, Libert, Thierry, Vanpaemel, Geert, and Marage, Pierre. Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van België. http://logica.ugent.be/centrum/preprints/De_Winter_(2012)_-_Brown.pdf.

De Langhe, Rogier. 2010. “The Division Of Labour In Science: The Tradeoff Between Specialisation And Diversity”. Journal of Economic Methodology 17: 37–51. http://logica.ugent.be/rogier/jemfinal.pdf.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2006. “The Division Of Labour In The Social Sciences Versus The Politics Of Metaphysics. Questioning Critical Realism's Interdisciplinarity”. Graduate Journal of Social Science 2: 32–39.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2019. “Do Mechanism-Based Social Explanations Make A Case For Methodological Individualism?”. JOURNAL FOR GENERAL PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE 50: 263–282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10838-019-09446-w.

Batens, Diderik. 1992. “Do We Need A Hierarchical Model Of Science?” John Earman. Inference, Explanation, and Other Frustrations. Essays in the Philosophy of Science: 199–215.