Batens, Diderik. 1968. “Some Proposals For The Solution Of The Carnap-Popper Discussion On `inductive Logic'”. Studia Philosophica Gandensia 6: 5–25.

Batens, Diderik. 1971. “Some Objections To Keith Lehrer's Rule Ir”. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 22: 357–362.

Batens, Diderik. 1975. 161 Werken uitgegeven door de Faculteit van de Letteren en Wijsbegeerte, Rijksuniversiteit Gent Studies In The Logic Of Induction And In The Logic Of Explanation. Containing A New Theory Of Meaning Relations. Brugge: De Tempel.

Batens, Diderik. 1976. “Some Contributions To The Logic Of Action”. Communication and Cognition 9: 347–376.

Batens, Diderik. 1976. “Some Remarks On The Relations Between Science And Values”. Philosophica 17: 13–46.

Batens, Diderik. 1986. “Some Remarks On The Structural Similarity Between Music And Logic” Leo Apostel, Sabbe, Herman, and Vandamme, Fernand. Reason, Emotion and Music. Towards a Common Structure for Arts, Sciences and Philosophies, Based on a Conceptual Framework for the Description of Music: 127–143.

Batens, Diderik. 1986. “Some Remarks On The Structural Similarity Between Music And Logic”. Communication and Cognition 19: 135–151.

Batens, Diderik. 1986. “Static And Dynamic Paraconsistent Logics And Their Use In Expert Systems”. CC-AI 3: 33–50.

Batens, Diderik. 1987. “The Structure Of Our Knowledge System” Fernand Vandamme. Communication and Cognition. Applied Epistemology: 101.

Weber, Erik. 1989. “Scientific Explanation, Necessity And Contingency”. PHILOSOPHICA (GENT) 44: 81–99.

Weber, Erik. 1992. “Scientific Explanation”. Philosophica 49: 148–154.

Weber, Erik. 1994. “Socialisatie, Sociale Controle En Sociologische Verklaringen Van Menselijke Handelingen.”. TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR SOCIALE WETENSCHAPPEN 38: 61–68.

Weber, Erik. 1995. “Scientific Arguments And Scientific Prediction.” F. H Van Eemeren, Grootendorst, R., Blair, J., and Willart, C. Special Fields and Cases. Proceedings on the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation IV: 377-387.

Weber, Erik. 1996. “Some Problems For Kitcher's Unification Account Of Explanation”. Communication & Cognition : Monographies 29: 441–456.

Meheus, Joke, and Diderik Batens. 1996. “Steering Problem Solving Between Cliff Incoherence And Cliff Solitude”. Philosophica 58: 153–187.

Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. 1996. “The Strange Case Of The Missing Body Of Mathematics”. Semiotica 112: 403–413.

Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. 1996. “Strict Finitism As A Viable Alternative In The Foundations Of Mathematics”. Logique et Analyse 37: 23–40.

Weber, Erik. 1997. “Scientific Explanation And The Interrogative Model Of Inquiry” M Sintonen. Knowledge and inquiry : essays on Jaakko Hintikka's epistemology and philosophy of science 51: 239–259.

Kurtonina, Natasha, and Maarten De Rijke. 1997. “Simulating Without Negation.”. Journal of logic and computation 7: 501–522.

Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. 1998. “Schoonheid In De Wiskunde: Birkhoff Revisited”. Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 60: 106–130.

Weber, Erik. 1999. “Scientific Revolutions, Rationality And Creativity”. Philosophica 64: 109–128.

Batens, Diderik. 2000. “A Survey Of Inconsistency-Adaptive Logics” Diderik Batens, Mortensen, Chris, Priest, Graham, and Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. Frontiers of Paraconsistent Logic: 49–73.

De Mey, Tim, and Markku Keinänen. 2001. “Secondary Qualities In Retrospect”. Philosophica 68: 41–59.

Batens, Diderik, and Joke Meheus. 2001. “Shortcuts And Dynamic Marking In The Tableau Method For Adaptive Logics”. Studia Logica 69: 221–248.

Batens, Diderik. 2002. “Some Computational Aspects Of Inconsistency-Adaptive Logics”. CLE e-Prints 2: 15 pp.