van Eck, Dingmar. 2011. “Incommensurability And Rationality In Engineering Design: The Case Of Functional Decomposition”. SOCIETY FOR PHILOSOPHY & TECHNOLOGY QUARTERLY ELECTRONIC JOURNAL 15: 118–136.

van Gulik, Stephan van der Wa. 2008. “A Fuzzy Logic Approach To Non-Scalar Hedges” David Makinson and Wansing, Heinrich. Towards Mathematical Philosophy: 233-247.

van Gulik, Stephan van der Wa. 2008. “Vage Logica's, Concepten En Betekenistransformatoren.”.

van Gulik, Stephan van der Wa. 2009. “Adaptive Fuzzy Logics For Contextual Hedge Interpretation”. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 18: 333–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10849-009-9084-y.

van Gulik, Stephan van der Wa. 2007. “On The Implementation Of Concept Structures In Fuzzy Logic.”. In Proceedings of the European Cognitive Science Conference 2007, Proceedings of the European Cognitive Science Conference 2007, S. Vosniadou, Kayser, D., and Athanassios, P.

van Gulik, Stephan van der Wa. 2009. “Menselijke Rationaliteit En Identiteit.” M. Van den Bossche and Vandemeulebroecke, R. Humanismen: 163-172.

van Gulik, Stephan van der Wa, and Peter Verdée. 2008. “Modeling Sorites Reasoning With Adaptive Fuzzy Logic”. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 159: 1869–1884.

Van Kerkhove, Bart, and Guido Vanackere. 2003. “Vagueness-Adaptive Logic: A Pragmatical Approach To Sorites Paradoxes”. Studia Logica 75: 383-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B%3ASTUD.0000009567.21578.0a.

Van Meirvenne, Joachim. 1994. “Indexed Inconsistency-Adaptive Logic”. Logique et Analyse 37: 41-55.

Vanackere, Guido. 2004. “Boekbespreking: "jan Albert Van Laar. The Dialectic Of Ambiguity. A Contribution To The Study Of Argumentation".”. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing 3: 248–251.

Vanackere, Guido. 2000. “Hl2, An Inconsistency-Adaptive And Inconsistency-Resolving Logic For General Statements That Might Have Exceptions”. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 10: 317–338.

Vanackere, Guido. 2004. “Logica En Het Waardevolle In De Wereld. De Rol Van Adaptieve Logica's Bij De Constructie Van Theorieën”.

Vanackere, Guido. 2001. “The Role Of Ambiguities In The Construction Of Collective Theories.”. Logique et Analyse 44: 189–214.

Vanackere, Guido. 2006. “A World Of Experiences, An Adequate Language, And Self-Reference Revised” Jacek Malinowski and Pietruszczak, Andrzej. Essays in Logic and Ontology 91: 243–256.

Vanackere, Guido, Andzrej Wisniewski, and Dorota Leszczynska. 2005. “Socratic Proofs And Paraconsistency: A Case Study”. Studia Logica 80: 431–466.

Vanackere, Guido. 2001. “Preferences As Inconsistency-Resolvers: An Inconsistency-Adaptive Tool”. Logic and Logical Philosophy 8: 47–63.

Vanackere, Guido. 2002. “Ontological Causes Of Inconsistency And A Change-Adaptive, Logical Solution” Walter A Carnielli, Coniglio, Marcelo E, and D'Ottaviano, Itala MLoffred. Paraconsistency. The Logical Way to the Inconsistent 228: 151–166.

Vanackere, Guido. 1997. “Ambiguity-Adaptive Logic”. Logique et Analyse 159: 261–280.

Vanackere, Guido. 2003. “Change In Individuals Without A Name. Contextual Indicators & The Free Change-Adaptive Logic”. Logic and Logical Philosophy 11: 213–230. http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2003.011.

Vanackere, Guido. 1999. “Minimizing Ambiguity And Paraconsistency.”. Logique et Analyse 42: 39–160.

Vanderbeeken, Robrecht. 2008. “Dispositions Pace Armstrong.” Tim De Mey and Keinänen, Markku. Problems from Armstrong 84: 127–154.

Vanderbeeken, Robrecht, and Gertrudis Van de Vijver. 2007. “Een Maat En Veel Gewichten. Repliek Op De Proefvlucht Van Buekens”. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 99: 211–221.

Vanderbeeken, Robrecht. 2004. “Models Of Intentional Explanation.”. Philosophical Explorations 7: 233–247.

Vanderbeeken, Robrecht. 2010. “What About Interdisciplinarity Within Philosophy?” Diederik Aerts. Worldviews, Science and Us: Bridging Knowledge and Its Implications For Our Perspectives on the World: 10–25.

Vanderbeeken, Robrecht, and Kristof De Clercq. 2003. “A Procedure For Generating (Conditional) Answers In A Goal-Directed Way” Claudio Delrieux and Legris, Javier. Computer modeling of scientific reasoning: 57–63.