@article {862760,
	title = {Adaptive fuzzy logics for contextual hedge interpretation},
	journal = {Journal of Logic, Language and Information},
	volume = {18},
	number = {3},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {333{\textendash}356},
	abstract = {<p>The article presents several adaptive fuzzy hedge logics. These logics are designed to perform a specific kind of hedge detection. Given a premise set Γ that represents a series of communicated statements, the logics can check whether some predicate occurring in Γ may be interpreted as being (implicitly) hedged by technically, strictly speaking or loosely speaking, or simply non-hedged. The logics take into account both the logical constraints of the premise set as well as conceptual information concerning the meaning of potentially hedged predicates (stored in the memory of the interpreter in question). The proof theory of the logics is non-monotonic in order to enable the logics to deal with possible non-monotonic interpretation dynamics (this is illustrated by means of several concrete proofs). All the adaptive fuzzy hedge logics are also sound and strongly complete with respect to their [0,1]-semantics.</p>},
	issn = {0925-8531},
	doi = {10.1007/s10849-009-9084-y},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10849-009-9084-y},
	author = {van der Waart van Gulik, Stephan}
}
