De Langhe, Rogier. 2009. “Trading Off Explanatory Virtues”. In Logic, Philosophy and History of Science in Belgium. Proceedings of the Young Researchers Days, Logic, Philosophy and History of Science in Belgium. Proceedings of the Young Researchers Days, Erik Weber, Libert, Thierry, Marage, Pierre, and Van Paemel, Geert. {Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van België.

Weber, Erik. 2009. “Varieties Of Democracy In Science Policy” Jeroen Van Bouwel. The Social Sciences and Democracy: 181–194.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2010. “Anti-Positionalism's Regress”. Axiomathes 20: 479–493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10516-010-9097-9.

Weber, Erik. 2010. “Causal Methodology. A Comment On Nancy Cartwright's Hunting Causes And Using Them”. Analysis 70: 318–325.

De Vreese, Leen, Erik Weber, and Jeroen Van Bouwel. 2010. “Explanatory Pluralism In The Medical Sciences: Theory And Practice”. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31: 371–390.

Weber, Erik, and Dunja Šešelja. 2010. “How To Identify Scientifc Revolutions?” Juan Manuel Torres. On Kuhn's Philosophy and its Legacy 8: 251–282.

Wieland, Jan Willem, and Erik Weber. 2010. “Metaphysical Explanatory Asymmetries”. Logique et Analyse 53: 345–365.

Wieland, Jan Willem, and Erik Weber. 2010. “Metaphysical Explanatory Asymmetries”. Logique et Analyse 53: 345–365.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2011. “An Atlas For The Social World: What Should It (Not) Look Like? Interdisciplinarity And Pluralism In The Social Sciences” Diederik Aerts, D'Hooghe, Bart, Pinxten, Rik, and Wallerstein, Immanuel. Worldviews, Science and Us: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Worlds, Cultures and Society.: 43–72.

Gervais, Raoul, and Erik Weber. 2011. “The Covering Law Model Applied To Dynamical Cognitive Science: A Comment On Joel Walmsley”. Minds and Machines 21: 33–39.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Erik Weber. 2011. “Explanation In The Social Sciences” Ian Jarvie and Zamora-Bonilla, Jesus. The SAGE Handbook of the Philosophy of the Social Sciences: 632–646.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2011. “Filling A Typical Gap In A Regress Argument”. Logique & Analyse 54: 589–597.

Meheus, Joke. 2011. “A Formal Logic For The Abduction Of Singular Hypotheses” Dennis Dieks, Gonzalez, Wenceslao J, Hartmann, Stephan, Uebel, Thomas, and Weber, Erik. Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation: 93–108.

Leuridan, Bert, and Erik Weber. 2011. “The Iarc And Mechanistic Evidence” Phyllis McKay Illari, Russo, Federica, and Williamson, Jon. Causality in the Sciences: 91–109.

Leuridan, Bert, and Erik Weber. 2011. “The Iarc And Mechanistic Evidence” Phyllis McKay Illari, Russo, Federica, and Williamson, Jon. Causality in the Sciences: 91–109.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, Erik Weber, and Leen De Vreese. 2011. “Indispensability Arguments In Favour Of Reductive Explanations”. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 42: 33–46.

De Saeger, David, and Erik Weber. 2011. “Needham's Grand Question Revisited: On The Meaning And Justification Of Causal Claims In The History Of Chinese Science”. East Asian Science, Technology and Medicine 33: 13–32.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2011. “Proto-Regress Argument Schemas”. ISSA 2010 Proceedings: 2000–2007.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2011. “Rules Regresses”. AGPC 2010 Proceedings: 79–92. http://www.illc.uva.nl/agpc/agpc10/.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2011. “The Sceptic's Tools: Circularity And Infinite Regress”. Philosophical Papers 40: 359–369.

Weber, Erik. 2012. “Can Economics Become A Purely Experimental Science? A Comparative Study” Diederik Aerts, Broekaert, Jan, D'Hooghe, Bart, and Note, Nicole. Worldviews, science and us : bridging knowledge and its implications for our perspectives on the world. http://www.worldscibooks.com/general/8341.html.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2012. “Can Pyrrhonists Act Normally?”. Philosophical Explorations 15: 227–289.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2012. “Carving The World As We Please”. Philosophica 84: 7–24.

Leuridan, Bert, and Erik Weber. 2012. “Causality And Explanation In The Sciences”. Theoria - revista de teoria historia y fundamentos de la ciencia 27: 133–136.

Weber, Erik, and Leen De Vreese. 2012. “Causation In Perspective: Are All Causal Claims Equally Warranted?”. Philosophica 84: 123–148.