Weber, Erik, and Liza Verhoeven. 2002. “Explanatory Proofs In Mathematics”. Logique et Analyse 45: 299–307.

Vermeir, Timothy. 2002. From Wffs To Clauses: Transforming Wffs In Clauses Without Loss Of Meaning.

Meheus, Joke. 2002. “Inconsistencies In Scientific Discovery. Clausius's Remarkable Derivation Of Carnot's Theorem” Helghe Krach, Vanpaemel, Geert, and Marage, Pierre. History of Modern Physics. Acta of the XXth International Congress of History of Science: 143–154.

Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. 2002. “Inconsistencies In The History Of Mathematics: The Case Of Infinitesimals.” Joke Meheus. Inconsistency in Science 2: 43–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0085-6_3.

Vermeir, Timothy. 2002. “An Inconsistency-Adaptive Proof Procedure For Logic Programming” Walter A Carnielli, Coniglio, Marcelo E, and D'Ottaviano, Itala MLoffred. Paraconsistency. The Logical Way to the Inconsistent: 323-340.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Erik Weber. 2002. “The Living Apart Together Relationship Between Causation And Explanation. A Comment On Jean Lachappelle.”. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32: 560-569.

Vanackere, Guido. 2002. “Ontological Causes Of Inconsistency And A Change-Adaptive, Logical Solution” Walter A Carnielli, Coniglio, Marcelo E, and D'Ottaviano, Itala MLoffred. Paraconsistency. The Logical Way to the Inconsistent 228: 151–166.

Batens, Diderik. 2002. “On A Partial Decision Method For Dynamic Proofs” Hendrik Dekker, Villadsen, Jorgen, and Waragai, Toshiharu. PCL 2002. Paraconsistent Computational Logic 95: 91–108. http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.LO/0207090.

De Mey, Tim. 2002. “Qualia, Spectruminversie En Filosofische Zombies.” Reynaert J P. Leilich and Veldeman, J. Het bewustzijn in de fysische wereld: Filosofische essays over materialisme en fenomenaal bewustzijn: 171-194.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Erik Weber. 2002. “Remote Causes, Bad Explanations?”. The Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 32: 437-449.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Barbara Verdonck. 2002. “Subject Ingebed? Over Het Methodologisch Individualisme In De Sociale Wetenschappen.” Rob Devos and Braeckman, Antoon. De terugkeer van het subject? Recente Ontwikkelingen binnen de filosofie: 169–179.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Barbara Verdonck. 2002. “Subject Ingebed? Over Het Methodologisch Individualisme In De Sociale Wetenschappen.” Rob Devos and Braeckman, Antoon. De terugkeer van het subject? Recente Ontwikkelingen binnen de filosofie: 169–179.

Weber, Erik, and Jeroen Van Bouwel. 2002. “Symposium On Explanation And Social Ontology 3: Can We Dispense With Structural Explanations Of Social Facts?”. Economics and Philosophy 18: 259–275.

Weber, Erik, and Maarten Van Dyck. 2002. “Unification And Explanation - A Comment On Halonen And Hintikka, And Schurz.”. Synthese 131: 145–154.

Weber, Erik, and Maarten Van Dyck. 2001. “Adaptive Logic And Covering Law Explanations”. Logique et Analyse 44: 237–254.

Verhoeven, Liza. 2001. “All Premises Are Equal, But Some Are More Equal Than Others.”. Logique et Analyse 44: 165–188.

Weber, Erik, and Robrecht Vanderbeeken. 2001. “A Pragmatic Approach To The Explanation Of Actions” Jörg Blasius, Hox, J., de Leeuw, E., and Schmidt, P. Social Science Methodology in the New Millenium.

Vanackere, Guido. 2001. “Preferences As Inconsistency-Resolvers: An Inconsistency-Adaptive Tool”. Logic and Logical Philosophy 8: 47–63.

Vanackere, Guido. 2001. “The Role Of Ambiguities In The Construction Of Collective Theories.”. Logique et Analyse 44: 189–214.

Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. 2000. “Alternative Mathematics: The Vague Way.” Décio Krause, French, Steven, and Doria, Francisco A. Festschrift in honor of Newton C.A. da Costa on the occasion of his seventieth birthday 125: 19–31.

Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. 2000. “Analogy And Metaphor As Essential Tools For The Working Mathematician” Fernand Hallyn. Metaphor and Analogy in the Sciences: 105–123.

Meheus, Joke. 2000. “An Extremely Rich Paraconsistent Logic And The Adaptive Logic Based On It” Diderik Batens, Mortensen, Chris, Priest, Graham, and Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. Frontiers of Paraconsistent Logic: 189–201.

Batens, Diderik, Chris Mortensen, Graham Priest, and Jean Paul Van Bendegem. 2000. Frontiers of Paraconsistent Logic Frontiers Of Paraconsistent Logic. Baldock, UK: Research Studies Press.

Vanackere, Guido. 2000. “Hl2, An Inconsistency-Adaptive And Inconsistency-Resolving Logic For General Statements That Might Have Exceptions”. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 10: 317–338.

Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. 2000. “Human(Istisch)E Wiskunde Of De Mogelijkheid Van Een Alternatieve Wiskunde.”. De toekomst van het heden : zijn we op weg naar een menselijker samenleving?: 127–140.