Froeyman, Anton. 2011. “Historische Uitvoeringspraktijk”. De uil van minerva 24: 21–38.

Ducheyne, Steffen. 2012. “History And Philosophy Of Science: From Peaceful Coexistence To Golden Age Of Interdisciplinarity?” Diederik Aerts, Broekaert, Jan, D'Hooghe, Bart, and Note, Nicole. Worldviews, Science and Us: Bridging Knowledge and its Implications for our Perpectives on the World.: 26-36.

De Mey, Tim. 2003. “Hoe Geschiedenis Tot Lering Strekt”. Ethiek en Maatschappij 6: 47–54.

De Langhe, Rogier. 2010. “How Monist Is Heterodoxy?”. Cambridge Journal of Economics 34: 793–805. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep057.

De Winter, Jan. 2014. “How (Not) To Reform Biomedical Research: A Review Of Some Policy Proposals”. Responsible Innovation 1 1: 97–110.

Urbaniak, Rafal. 2011. “How Not To Use The Church-Turing Thesis Against Platonism”. Philosophia Mathematica 19: 74–89.

Weber, Erik. 2009. “How Probabilistic Causation Can Account For The Use Of Mechanistic Evidence”. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23: 277–-295.

Weber, Erik, and Dunja Šešelja. 2010. “How To Identify Scientifc Revolutions?” Juan Manuel Torres. On Kuhn's Philosophy and its Legacy 8: 251–282.

De Winter, Jan. 2012. “How To Make The Research Agenda In The Health Sciences Less Distorted”. THEORIA - REVISTA DE TEORIA HISTORIA Y FUNDAMENTOS DE LA CIENCIA 27: 75–93.

Provijn, Dagmar. 2002. “How To Obtain Elegant Fitch-Style Proofs From Goal Directed Ones.”. In Proceedings of the Fourtheenth Belgium-Netherlands Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2002, Proceedings of the Fourtheenth Belgium-Netherlands Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2002, H. Blockeel and Denecker, M.

Weber, Erik, Jeroen Van Bouwel, and Leen De Vreese. 2013. “How To Study Scientific Explanation?”. Scientific Explanation: 25–37.

Van De Putte, Frederik, Stef Frijters, and Joke Meheus. 2018. “How To Take Heroin (If At All). A New Approach To Detachment In Deontic Logic” Cleo Condoravdi, Nair, Shyam, and Pigozzi, Gabriella. Deontic Logic and Normative Systems: 14th International Conference: 317-335.

De Mol, Liesbeth. 2008. “How To Talk With A Computer: An Essay On Computability And Man-Computer Conversations”. Off Topic: Ubersetzen. Zeitschrift für Medienkunst der KHM 1: 80–89.

Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. 2000. “Human(Istisch)E Wiskunde Of De Mogelijkheid Van Een Alternatieve Wiskunde.”. De toekomst van het heden : zijn we op weg naar een menselijker samenleving?: 127–140.

Ducheyne, Steffen. 2007. “Huygens's Understanding Of Trajectory: Via Media Between Galileo And Newton”. Historia scientiarum, International Journal of the History of Science Society of Japan 17: 1–19.

Faroldi, Federico LG, and Tudor Protopopescu. 2019. “Hyperintensional Logics Of Reasons”. Logic Journal of the IGPL.

Faroldi, Federico LG. 2019. Hyperintensionality And Normativity. Springer.

Heeffer, Albrecht. 2011. “Hypocrisie Binnen De Wiskunde?”. Wiskunde & onderwijs 148: 306–315.

Froeyman, Anton. 2013. “'i Began With The Desire To Speak With The Dead': De Ethiek Als 'eerste Filosofie' Van De Geschiedschrijving”.

Leuridan, Bert, and Erik Weber. 2011. “The Iarc And Mechanistic Evidence” Phyllis McKay Illari, Russo, Federica, and Williamson, Jon. Causality in the Sciences: 91–109.

Weber, Erik, Thomas Reydon, Mieke Boon, Wybo Houkes, and Pieter Vermaas. 2013. “The Ice-Theory Of Technical Functions”. Metascience 22: 23–44.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2006. “The Idea Of Social Mechanisms In Social Scientific Explanations.” John Z Arlsdale. Progress in Social Psychology Research: 83–95.

Ducheyne, Steffen. 2007. “"ignorance Is Bliss": On Bernard Nieuwentijt's Doctrina Ignorantia And His Contribution To Our Understanding Of Scientific Idealisation”. Rivista di storia della filosofia 62: 699-710.

De Mey, Tim. 2006. “Imagination's Grip On Science”. Metaphilosophy 37: 222–239.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2004. “Imperialistische Tendensen In De Economiebeoefening En Politieke Wetenschappen. Over Heterodoxie En Pluralisme In De Sociale Wetenschappen”. Ethiek & maatschappij 7: 32–45.