Batens, Diderik. 2000. “On The Epistemological Justification Of Pluralism And Tolerance”. Philosophica 65: 33–54.

Meheus, Joke. 2000. “An Extremely Rich Paraconsistent Logic And The Adaptive Logic Based On It” Diderik Batens, Mortensen, Chris, Priest, Graham, and Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. Frontiers of Paraconsistent Logic: 189–201.

Batens, Diderik, Chris Mortensen, Graham Priest, and Jean Paul Van Bendegem. 2000. Frontiers of Paraconsistent Logic Frontiers Of Paraconsistent Logic. Baldock, UK: Research Studies Press.

Vanackere, Guido. 2000. “Hl2, An Inconsistency-Adaptive And Inconsistency-Resolving Logic For General Statements That Might Have Exceptions”. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 10: 317–338.

Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. 2000. “Human(Istisch)E Wiskunde Of De Mogelijkheid Van Een Alternatieve Wiskunde.”. De toekomst van het heden : zijn we op weg naar een menselijker samenleving?: 127–140.

Vermeir, Timothy. 2000. “Inconsistency-Adaptive Arithmetic”. Logique et Analyse 42: 221-241.

Batens, Diderik. 2000. “Minimally Abnormal Models In Some Adaptive Logics”. Synthese 125: 5–18.

Batens, Diderik. 2000. “Rich Inconsistency-Adaptive Logics. The Clash Between Heuristic Efficiency And Realistic Reconstruction” Eric Grillet and Beets, François. Logique en perspective. Mélanges offerts à Paul Gochet: 513–543.

Batens, Diderik. 2000. “A Survey Of Inconsistency-Adaptive Logics” Diderik Batens, Mortensen, Chris, Priest, Graham, and Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. Frontiers of Paraconsistent Logic: 49–73.

Batens, Diderik, and Joke Meheus. 2000. “A Tableau Method For Inconsistency-Adaptive Logics” Roy Dyckhoff. Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods 1847: 127–142.

Batens, Diderik. 2000. “Towards The Unification Of Inconsistency Handling Mechanisms”. Logic and Logical Philosophy 8: 5–31.

De Clercq, Kristof. 2000. “Two New Strategies For Inconsistency-Adaptive Logics”. Logic and Logical Philosophy 8: 65–80.

Weber, Erik, and Maarten Van Dyck. 2001. “Adaptive Logic And Covering Law Explanations”. Logique et Analyse 44: 237–254.

Meheus, Joke. 2001. “Adaptive Logics For Question Evocation”. Logique et Analyse 44: 135–164.

Verhoeven, Liza. 2001. “All Premises Are Equal, But Some Are More Equal Than Others.”. Logique et Analyse 44: 165–188.

Batens, Diderik. 2001. Aspects Of The Dynamics Of Discussions And Logics Handling Them.

Batens, Diderik, and Lieven Haesaert. 2001. “On Classical Adaptive Logics Of Induction”. Logique et Analyse 44: 255–290.

Christiaens, Wim. 2001. “De Cirkel Sluiten. Aanzet Tot Een Wetenschappelijke Metafysica”.

Batens, Diderik. 2001. “A Dynamic Characterization Of The Pure Logic Of Relevant Implication”. Journal of Philosophical Logic 30: 267-280.

Carnielli, Walter A, and João Marcos. 2001. “Ex Contradictione Non Sequitur Quodlibet”. In Proceedings of the 2000 Advanced Reasoning Forum Conference, Proceedings of the 2000 Advanced Reasoning Forum Conference,.

Batens, Diderik. 2001. “A General Characterization Of Adaptive Logics”. Logique et Analyse 44: 45–68.

Batens, Diderik, and Joke Meheus. 2001. “On The Logic And Pragmatics Of The Process Of Explanation” Mika Kiikeri and Ylikoski, Petri. Explanatory Connections. Electronic Essays Dedicated to Matti Sintonen. http://www.valt.helsinki.fi/kfil/matti/.

Caleiro, Carlos, and João Marcos. 2001. “Non-Truth-Functional Fibred Semantics” Hamid R Arabnia. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IC-AI'2001) 2: 841–847.

Batens, Diderik. 2001. “Over De Zin Van Het Leven En De Zingevende Functie Van Wereldbeelden”. Mores 226: 41–63.

Weber, Erik, and Robrecht Vanderbeeken. 2001. “A Pragmatic Approach To The Explanation Of Actions” Jörg Blasius, Hox, J., de Leeuw, E., and Schmidt, P. Social Science Methodology in the New Millenium.