Batens, Diderik, Joke Meheus, Dagmar Provijn, and Liza Verhoeven. 2003. “Some Adaptive Logics For Diagnosis”. Logic and Logical Philosophy 11/12: 39–65.

Batens, Diderik. 2003. “A Strengthening Of The Rescher–Manor Consequence Relations”. Logique et Analyse 46: 289–313.

De Mey, Tim. 2003. “Thinking Through Thought Experiments”.

Klijn, Alex. 2003. “Using Classical Resolution Method To Check Derivability For Some Propositional Paralogics And Adaptive Logics.”.

Van Kerkhove, Bart, and Guido Vanackere. 2003. “Vagueness-Adaptive Logic: A Pragmatical Approach To Sorites Paradoxes”. Studia Logica 75: 383-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B%3ASTUD.0000009567.21578.0a.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2003. “Verklaringspluralisme In De Sociale Wetenschappen”. Belgisch tijdschrift voor nieuwste geschiedenis – Revue belge d’histoire 33: 303–311.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2003. “Verklaringspluralisme In De Sociale Wetenschappen. Een Wetenschapsfilosofische Verdediging Met Toepassingen In De Geschiedbeoefening, De Theorie Van Internationale Relaties En De Economische Wetenschappen”.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2003. “When Unveiling The Epistemic Fallacy Ends With Committing The Ontological Fallacy. On The Contribution Of Critical Realism To The Social Scientific Explanatory Practice”. Philosophica 71: 81–98.

Meheus, Joke. 2002. “An Adaptive Logic For Pragmatic Truth” Walter A Carnielli, Coniglio, Marcelo E, and D'Ottaviano, Itala MLoffred. Paraconsistency. The Logical Way to the Inconsistent: 167–185.

Meheus, Joke, Liza Verhoeven, Maarten Van Dyck, and Dagmar Provijn. 2002. “Ampliative Adaptive Logics And The Foundation Of Logic-Based Approaches To Abduction”. Logical and Computational Aspects of Model-Based Reasoning: 39–71.

Batens, Diderik, and Timothy Vermeir. 2002. “Direct Dynamic Proofs For The Rescher–Manor Consequence Relations: The Flat Case”. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 12: 63–84.

Vanderbeeken, Robrecht, and Erik Weber. 2002. “Dispositional Explanations Of Behavior.”. Behavior and Philosophy 30: 43–59.

Haesaert, Lieven. 2002. “Een Adaptieve Logica Voor Het Beschrijven Van Inductie”. In Handelingen van de 24ste Nederlands-Vlaamse Filosofiedag: Filosofie en Empirie, Handelingen van de 24ste Nederlands-Vlaamse Filosofiedag: Filosofie en Empirie, Universiteit Amsterdam.

Casteleyn, Brenda. 2002. “Epistemologie”.

Provijn, Dagmar. 2002. “Is Er Een Diepe Kloof Tussen De Heuristiek En De Inferentieregels Van Een Bewijstheorie? Een Poging Tot Integratie.”. In Handelingen van de 24ste Nederlands-Vlaamse Filosofiedag: Filosofie en Empirie, Handelingen van de 24ste Nederlands-Vlaamse Filosofiedag: Filosofie en Empirie, Universiteit Amsterdam.

Weber, Erik, and Liza Verhoeven. 2002. “Explanatory Proofs In Mathematics”. Logique et Analyse 45: 299–307.

Vermeir, Timothy. 2002. From Wffs To Clauses: Transforming Wffs In Clauses Without Loss Of Meaning.

Provijn, Dagmar. 2002. “How To Obtain Elegant Fitch-Style Proofs From Goal Directed Ones.”. In Proceedings of the Fourtheenth Belgium-Netherlands Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2002, Proceedings of the Fourtheenth Belgium-Netherlands Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2002, H. Blockeel and Denecker, M.

Batens, Diderik. 2002. “In Defence Of A Programme For Handling Inconsistencies” Joke Meheus. Inconsistency in Science: 129–150.

Meheus, Joke. 2002. “Inconsistencies In Scientific Discovery. Clausius's Remarkable Derivation Of Carnot's Theorem” Helghe Krach, Vanpaemel, Geert, and Marage, Pierre. History of Modern Physics. Acta of the XXth International Congress of History of Science: 143–154.

Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. 2002. “Inconsistencies In The History Of Mathematics: The Case Of Infinitesimals.” Joke Meheus. Inconsistency in Science 2: 43–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0085-6_3.

Vermeir, Timothy. 2002. “An Inconsistency-Adaptive Proof Procedure For Logic Programming” Walter A Carnielli, Coniglio, Marcelo E, and D'Ottaviano, Itala MLoffred. Paraconsistency. The Logical Way to the Inconsistent: 323-340.

Ducheyne, Steffen. 2002. “Isaac Newton On Space And Time: Metaphysician Or Not?”. Philosophica 67: 77–114.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Erik Weber. 2002. “The Living Apart Together Relationship Between Causation And Explanation. A Comment On Jean Lachappelle.”. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32: 560-569.

D'Hanis, Isabel. 2002. “A Logical Approach To The Analysis Of Metaphors” Lorenzo Magnani, Nersessian, Nancy, and Pizzi, Claudio. Logical and Computational Aspects of Model-Based Reasoning 25: 21–37.