Lycke, Hans. 2009. “The Adaptive Logics Approach To Abduction”. In Logic, Philosophy and History of Science in Belgium. Proceedings of the Young Researcher Days 2008, Logic, Philosophy and History of Science in Belgium. Proceedings of the Young Researcher Days 2008, Erik Weber, Libert, Thierry, Marage, Pierre, and Vanpaemel, Geert. {Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van België.

Lycke, Hans. 2010. “An Adaptive Logic For The Formal Explication Of Scalar Implicatures”. In New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence: JSAI-isAI 2009 Workshops, New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence: JSAI-isAI 2009 Workshops, Kumiyo Nakakoji, Murakami, Yohei, and McCready, Eric. Springer Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14888-0\_20.

Lycke, Hans. 2005. “An Adaptive Logic For Compassionate Relevantism”. In Computational Models of Scientific Reasoning and Applications, Computational Models of Scientific Reasoning and Applications, Luis Moniz Pereira and Wheeler, Gregory. CENTRIA.

Primiero, Giuseppe, and Joke Meheus. 2008. “Adaptive Arbitration By Variant Counting On Commutative Bases With Weights”. In Fusion 2008: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information Fusion, Fusion 2008: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information Fusion, IEEE.

Vanackere, Guido. 2006. “A World Of Experiences, An Adequate Language, And Self-Reference Revised” Jacek Malinowski and Pietruszczak, Andrzej. Essays in Logic and Ontology 91: 243–256.

Straßer, Christian, Dunja Šešelja, and Jan Willem Wieland. 2015. “Withstanding Tensions: Scientific Disagreement And Epistemic Tolerance” Emiliano Ippoliti. Heuristic Reasoning 16: 113–146.

De Mey, Tim, and Dagmar Provijn. 2010. “William Harvey En De Ontdekking Van De Bloedsomloop.” Linda Van Speybroeck and Braeckman, Johan. Fascinerend Leven. Markante Figuren en Ideeën uit de Geschiedenis van de Biologie.

Weber, Erik, and Kristof De Clercq. 2002. “Why The Logic Of Explanation Is Inconsistency-Adaptive.” Joke Meheus. Inconsistency in science: 165–184.

De Langhe, Rogier. 2009. “Why Should I Adopt Pluralism?” Rob Garnett, Olsen, Erik, and Starr, Martha. Economic Pluralism.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2009. “Where The Epistemic And The Political Meet.” Jeroen Van Bouwel. The Social Sciences and Democracy: 1–13.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2012. “What Is There Beyond Mertonian And Dollar Green Science? Exploring The Contours Of Epistemic Democracy” Robrecht Vanderbeeken, Le Roy, Frederik, Stalpaert, Christel, and Aerts, Diederik. Drunk on capitalism : an interdisciplinary reflection on market economy, art and science 11: 35–48.

Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. 1998. “What, If Anything, Is An Experiment In Mathematics?” Dionysios Anapolitanos, Baltas, Aristides, and Tsinorema, Stavroula. Philosophy and the Many Faces of Science: 172–182.

Vanderbeeken, Robrecht. 2010. “What About Interdisciplinarity Within Philosophy?” Diederik Aerts. Worldviews, Science and Us: Bridging Knowledge and Its Implications For Our Perspectives on the World: 10–25.

Weber, Erik. 1993. “Wetenschappelijke Verklaringen En Subjectief Verwacht Nut” Wim van Dooren and Hoff, Tineke. Actueel Filosoferen: 53-60.

Batens, Diderik. 1986. “Wetenschap En Vrijzinnige Waarden”. De specificiteit van Vrijzinnig Humanistische Waarden: 1–14.

Weber, Erik. 1994. “Waarom Wesley Salmons Causaal-Mechanische Model Van Verklaring Niet Volstaat” Jean Paul Van Bendegem and Cornelis, Gustaaf C. Iedereen die niet denkt zoals ik, volge mij. Acta 16de Nederlands-Vlaamse Filosofiedag: 81-86.

Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. 1997. “Vrijzinnig (?) Humanisme (?) In Een Moderne (?) Wereld.” Christian Van Kerckhove. Grondslagen Vrijzinnig Humanisme: 149-169.

Batens, Diderik. 1977. “Verisimilitude And Meaning Relations” Marc De Mey, Pinxten, Rik, Poriau, M., and Vandamme, Fernand. CC77. International Workshop on the Cognitive Viewpoint: 321–328.

Weber, Erik. 2009. “Varieties Of Democracy In Science Policy” Jeroen Van Bouwel. The Social Sciences and Democracy: 181–194.

Beirlaen, Mathieu. 2012. “A Unifying Framework For Reasoning About Normative Conflicts” Michal Pelis and Puncochar, Vit. The logica yearbook 2011: 1–14.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2009. “Understanding In Political Science: The Plurality Of Epistemic Interests” Henk De Regt, Leonelli, Sabina, and Eigner, Kai. Scientific Understanding. Philosophical Perspectives: 298–313.

Primiero, Giuseppe. 2012. “Type-Theoretical Dynamics. Exploring Belief Revision In A Constructive Framework” Shahid Rahman, Primiero, Giuseppe, and Marion, Mathieu. The realism-antirealism debate in the age of alternative logics: 191–212.

Primiero, Giuseppe, and Bjørn Jespersen. 2009. “Two Type-Theoretical Approaches To Privative Modification” Kumiyo Nakakoji, Murakami, Yohei, and McCready, Eric. New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence: JSAI-isAI 2009 Workshops: 239–258.

Batens, Diderik. 1987. “Two Semantically Motivated Enrichments Of Relevant Logics” Jerzy Perzanowski. Essays in Philosophical Logic: 65–74.

Batens, Diderik. 2015. “Two, Many, And Differently Many” Arnold Koslow and Buchsbaum, Arthur. The Road to Universal Logic. Festschrift for the 50th Birthday of Jean-Yves Béziau II: 213–242.