@incollection {strasser2015withstanding,
	title = {Withstanding Tensions: {S}cientific Disagreement and Epistemic Tolerance},
	booktitle = {Heuristic Reasoning},
	series = {Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics},
	volume = {16},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {113{\textendash}146},
	publisher = {Springer},
	abstract = {<p>Many philosophers of science consider scientific disagreementto be a major promoter of scientific progress. However, we lack an ac-count of the epistemically and heuristically appropriate response scien-tists should have towards opposing positions in peer disagreements. Eventhough some scientific pluralists have advocated a notion of tolerance,the implications of this notion for ones epistemic stance and, more gen-erally, for the scientific practice have been insuficiently explicated in theliterature. In this paper we explicate a characteristic tension in whichdisagreeing scientists are situated and on this basis we propose a notionof epistemic tolerance.</p>},
	author = {Stra{\ss}er, Christian and {\v S}e{\v s}elja, Dunja and Wieland, Jan Willem},
	editor = {Ippoliti, Emiliano}
}
