Publications
. 1997. “L.e.j. Brouwer.”. Kritisch Denkerslexicon 23: 1-14.
. 2015. “Towards Democratic Models Of Science: Exploring The Case Of Scientific Pluralism”. Perspectives on science 23: 149–172.

. 2004. “The Consequences Of Scientific Pluralism For Science Policy”. In Proceedings of V Jornadas Latinoamericanas de estudios sociales de la ciencia y de la tecnología, Proceedings of V Jornadas Latinoamericanas de estudios sociales de la ciencia y de la tecnología,.

. 2002. “Subject Ingebed? Over Het Methodologisch Individualisme In De Sociale Wetenschappen.” . De terugkeer van het subject? Recente Ontwikkelingen binnen de filosofie: 169–179.

. 2005. “Heeft Er Iemand Een Wetenschapsbeleid Gezien? Over Wetenschap, Democratie En De Onderzoeksagenda”. Samenleving en politiek 12: 12–18. http://www.stichtinggerritkreveld.be/ECMS\_CLIENT/configuration/pages/artikel.php?aid=307.

. 2008. “A Pragmatist Defense Of Non-Relativistic Explanatory Pluralism In History And Social Science.”. History and theory 47: 168–182.

. 2006. “The Idea Of Social Mechanisms In Social Scientific Explanations.” . Progress in Social Psychology Research: 83–95.

. 2012. “What Is There Beyond Mertonian And Dollar Green Science? Exploring The Contours Of Epistemic Democracy” . Drunk on capitalism : an interdisciplinary reflection on market economy, art and science 11: 35–48.

. 2004. “Questioning Structurism As A New Standard For Social Scientific Explanations”. Graduate Journal of Social Science 1: 204–226.

. 2011. “Indispensability Arguments In Favour Of Reductive Explanations”. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 42: 33–46.

. 2014. “Pluralists About Pluralism? Different Versions Of Explanatory Pluralism In Psychiatry” . New directions in the philosophy of science: 104–119.

. 2006. “De Idee Van Emergentie In De Sociologie: Perspectieven En Problemen”. Tijdschrijft voor sociologie 27: 337–350.

. 2011. “Explanation In The Social Sciences” . The SAGE Handbook of the Philosophy of the Social Sciences: 632–646.

. 2017. “Beyond Consensus? A Reply To Alan Irwin”. SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY REVIEW AND REPLY COLLECTIVE 6: 48–53.

. 2011. “An Atlas For The Social World: What Should It (Not) Look Like? Interdisciplinarity And Pluralism In The Social Sciences” . Worldviews, Science and Us: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Worlds, Cultures and Society.: 43–72.

. 2010. “Why Social Emergence? Discussing The Use Of Analytical Metaphysics In Social Theory”. In Worldviews, science and us : studies of analytical metaphysics, Worldviews, science and us : studies of analytical metaphysics, . World Scientific Publishing Company. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789814299053\_0010.

. 2004. “Explanatory Pluralism In Economics: Against The Mainstream?”. Philosophical Explorations 7: 299–315.

. 2002. “The Living Apart Together Relationship Between Causation And Explanation. A Comment On Jean Lachappelle.”. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32: 560-569.

. 2008. “Explanatory Pluralism.” . Pluralist Economics: 151-170.

. 2006. “The Division Of Labour In The Social Sciences Versus The Politics Of Metaphysics. Questioning Critical Realism's Interdisciplinarity”. Graduate Journal of Social Science 2: 32–39.

. 2003. “Verklaringspluralisme In De Sociale Wetenschappen”. Belgisch tijdschrift voor nieuwste geschiedenis Revue belge dhistoire 33: 303–311.

. 2019. “Do Mechanism-Based Social Explanations Make A Case For Methodological Individualism?”. JOURNAL FOR GENERAL PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE 50: 263–282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10838-019-09446-w.

. 2009. “Where The Epistemic And The Political Meet.” . The Social Sciences and Democracy: 1–13.

. 2004. “Imperialistische Tendensen In De Economiebeoefening En Politieke Wetenschappen. Over Heterodoxie En Pluralisme In De Sociale Wetenschappen”. Ethiek & maatschappij 7: 32–45.


]