@article {307815,
	title = {Explanatory pluralism in economics: {A}gainst the mainstream?},
	journal = {Philosophical Explorations},
	volume = {7},
	number = {3},
	year = {2004},
	pages = {299{\textendash}315},
	abstract = {<p>Recent pleas for more heterodoxy in explaining economic action have been defending a pluralism for economics. In this article, I analyse these defences by scrutinizing the pluralistic qualities in the work of one of the major voices of heterodoxy, Tony Lawson. This scrutiny will focus on Lawson{\textquoteright}s alternatives concerning ontology and explanation to <strong>mainstream</strong> economics. Subsequently, I will raise some doubts about Lawson{\textquoteright}s pluralism, and identify questions that will have to be addressed by heterodox economists in order to maintain the claim of pluralism.</p>},
	issn = {1386-9795},
	author = {Van Bouwel, Jeroen}
}
