Publications
“Explanatory Pluralism.” . Pluralist Economics: 151-170.
. 2008. “The Division Of Labour In The Social Sciences Versus The Politics Of Metaphysics. Questioning Critical Realism's Interdisciplinarity”. Graduate Journal of Social Science 2: 32–39.
. 2006. “Verklaringspluralisme In De Sociale Wetenschappen”. Belgisch tijdschrift voor nieuwste geschiedenis Revue belge dhistoire 33: 303–311.
. 2003. “Where The Epistemic And The Political Meet.” . The Social Sciences and Democracy: 1–13.
. 2009. “Imperialistische Tendensen In De Economiebeoefening En Politieke Wetenschappen. Over Heterodoxie En Pluralisme In De Sociale Wetenschappen”. Ethiek & maatschappij 7: 32–45.
. 2004. “Remote Causes, Bad Explanations?”. The Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 32: 437-449.
. 2002. “Explanatory Strategies Beyond The Individualism/holism Debate” . Rethinking the individualism-holism debate 372: 153–175.
. 2014. “The Ambiguity Of Unification In The Social Sciences.”. In 2e Congrès de la Société de Philosophie des Sciences, 2e Congrès de la Société de Philosophie des Sciences,.
. 2007. “When Unveiling The Epistemic Fallacy Ends With Committing The Ontological Fallacy. On The Contribution Of Critical Realism To The Social Scientific Explanatory Practice”. Philosophica 71: 81–98.
. 2003. “The Problem With(Out) Consensus: The Scientific Consensus, Deliberative Democracy And Agonistic Pluralism.” . The social sciences and democracy: 121–142.
. 2009. “Towards A Framework For Pluralisms In Economics”. Post-Autistic Economics Review 30: 24–27.
. 2005. “De-Ontologizing The Debate On Social Explanations: A Pragmatic Approach Based On Epistemic Interests.”. Human Studies 31: 423–442.
. 2008. “Beyond Consensus? A Reply To Alan Irwin”. SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY REVIEW AND REPLY COLLECTIVE 6: 48–53.
. 2017. “Understanding In Political Science: The Plurality Of Epistemic Interests” . Scientific Understanding. Philosophical Perspectives: 298–313.
. 2009. “Towards Democratic Models Of Science: Exploring The Case Of Scientific Pluralism”. Perspectives on science 23: 149–172.
. 2015. “The Consequences Of Scientific Pluralism For Science Policy”. In Proceedings of V Jornadas Latinoamericanas de estudios sociales de la ciencia y de la tecnología, Proceedings of V Jornadas Latinoamericanas de estudios sociales de la ciencia y de la tecnología,.
. 2004. “Subject Ingebed? Over Het Methodologisch Individualisme In De Sociale Wetenschappen.” . De terugkeer van het subject? Recente Ontwikkelingen binnen de filosofie: 169–179.
. 2002. “Heeft Er Iemand Een Wetenschapsbeleid Gezien? Over Wetenschap, Democratie En De Onderzoeksagenda”. Samenleving en politiek 12: 12–18. http://www.stichtinggerritkreveld.be/ECMS\_CLIENT/configuration/pages/artikel.php?aid=307.
. 2005. “A Pragmatist Defense Of Non-Relativistic Explanatory Pluralism In History And Social Science.”. History and theory 47: 168–182.
. 2008. “Do Mechanism-Based Social Explanations Make A Case For Methodological Individualism?”. JOURNAL FOR GENERAL PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE 50: 263–282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10838-019-09446-w.
. 2019. “The Idea Of Social Mechanisms In Social Scientific Explanations.” . Progress in Social Psychology Research: 83–95.
. 2006. “What Is There Beyond Mertonian And Dollar Green Science? Exploring The Contours Of Epistemic Democracy” . Drunk on capitalism : an interdisciplinary reflection on market economy, art and science 11: 35–48.
. 2012. “Twee Grote Verhalen Over Wetenschap (Voor Allen En Voor Niemand).” . Ik & het verhaal: 107-130.
. 1997. “What, If Anything, Is An Experiment In Mathematics?” . Philosophy and the Many Faces of Science: 172–182.
. 1998. “Ook Het Oneindige Is Ons Werk” . Leo Apostel. Tien filosofen getuigen: 119–134.
. 1996.