Weber, Erik. 1997. “Scientific Explanation And The Interrogative Model Of Inquiry” M Sintonen. Knowledge and inquiry : essays on Jaakko Hintikka's epistemology and philosophy of science 51: 239–259.

Weber, Erik. 1998. “Bespreking Van Jean Paul Van Bendegem: Tot In Der Eindigheid”. Ethiek & Maatschappij 1: 128–130.

Weber, Erik. 1998. “Editorial Preface.”. Logique et analyse 41: 269–270.

Weber, Erik. 1998. “The Practical Function And Epistemology Of Causal Beliefs”. Communication & Cognition : Monographies 31: 297–324.

Weber, Erik. 1998. “Prudential Arguments In The Realism Debate.”. Logique et Analyse 41: 301–312.

Weber, Erik, and Dagmar Provijn. 1999. “A Formal Analysis Of Diagnosis And Diagnostic Reasoning”. Logique et Analyse 42: 161–180.

Weber, Erik. 1999. “Introduction.”. FOUNDATIONS OF SCIENCE 3: 231–234.

Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. 1999. “Oorlog En Vrede In Wetenschapsland” Else Walraves and Stuy, Johan. Denken als Openheid. Liber Amicorum Hubert Dethier: 153-160.

Weber, Erik. 1999. “Rationality In The Discovery Of Empirical Laws”. Foundations of Science 4: 355–368.

Weber, Erik. 1999. “Scientific Revolutions, Rationality And Creativity”. Philosophica 64: 109–128.

Weber, Erik. 1999. “Unification: What Is It, How Do We Reach And Why Do We Want It?”. Synthese 118: 479–499.

Weber, Erik, and Wim Christiaens. 1999. “World Models And Inconsistencies.”. Foundations of Science 3: 285–311.

Weber, Erik, and Maarten Van Dyck. 2001. “Adaptive Logic And Covering Law Explanations”. Logique et Analyse 44: 237–254.

Weber, Erik, and Robrecht Vanderbeeken. 2001. “A Pragmatic Approach To The Explanation Of Actions” Jörg Blasius, Hox, J., de Leeuw, E., and Schmidt, P. Social Science Methodology in the New Millenium.

Vanderbeeken, Robrecht, and Erik Weber. 2002. “Dispositional Explanations Of Behavior.”. Behavior and Philosophy 30: 43–59.

Weber, Erik, and Liza Verhoeven. 2002. “Explanatory Proofs In Mathematics”. Logique et Analyse 45: 299–307.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Erik Weber. 2002. “The Living Apart Together Relationship Between Causation And Explanation. A Comment On Jean Lachappelle.”. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32: 560-569.

Batens, Diderik. 2002. “On A Partial Decision Method For Dynamic Proofs” Hendrik Dekker, Villadsen, Jorgen, and Waragai, Toshiharu. PCL 2002. Paraconsistent Computational Logic 95: 91–108. http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.LO/0207090.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Erik Weber. 2002. “Remote Causes, Bad Explanations?”. The Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 32: 437-449.

Weber, Erik, and Jeroen Van Bouwel. 2002. “Symposium On Explanation And Social Ontology 3: Can We Dispense With Structural Explanations Of Social Facts?”. Economics and Philosophy 18: 259–275.

Weber, Erik, and Maarten Van Dyck. 2002. “Unification And Explanation - A Comment On Halonen And Hintikka, And Schurz.”. Synthese 131: 145–154.

Weber, Erik, and Kristof De Clercq. 2002. “Why The Logic Of Explanation Is Inconsistency-Adaptive.” Joke Meheus. Inconsistency in science: 165–184.

Weber, Erik. 2003. “Explaining Laws By Reduction”. In Philosophical Dimensions of Logic and Science, Philosophical Dimensions of Logic and Science, A Rojsczak, Cachro, J, and Kurczewski, G. Dordrecht: Springer.

De Mey, Tim, and Erik Weber. 2003. “Explanation And Thought Experiments In History.”. History and Theory 42: 28–38.

De Vreese, Leen, and Erik Weber. 2003. Searching For Singular Causal Explanations: A Formal Analysis.