Vanackere, Guido. 2001. “Preferences As Inconsistency-Resolvers: An Inconsistency-Adaptive Tool”. Logic and Logical Philosophy 8: 47–63.

Batens, Diderik, and Dagmar Provijn. 2001. “Pushing The Search Paths In The Proofs. A Study In Proof Heuristics”. Logique et Analyse 44: 113–134.

Klijn, Alex. 2001. “Robots En Onderwijs.”. Mores 28: 249-263.

Vanackere, Guido. 2001. “The Role Of Ambiguities In The Construction Of Collective Theories.”. Logique et Analyse 44: 189–214.

De Mey, Tim, and Markku Keinänen. 2001. “Secondary Qualities In Retrospect”. Philosophica 68: 41–59.

Batens, Diderik, and Joke Meheus. 2001. “Shortcuts And Dynamic Marking In The Tableau Method For Adaptive Logics”. Studia Logica 69: 221–248.

Carnielli, Walter A, and João Marcos. 2001. “Tableau Systems For Logics Of Formal Inconsistency” Hamid R Arabnia. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IC-AI'2001): 848-852.

Carnielli, Walter A, João Marcos, and Itala MLoffred D'Ottaviano. 2001. “A Taxonomy Of C-Systems” Walter A Carnielli and Coniglio, Marcelo E. Paraconsistency. The Logical Way to the Inconsistent: 1-94.

Christiaens, Wim. 2001. “This Universe Is The `best' Of All Possible Worlds. A Tentative Reconstruction Of The Metaphysical System Of Leo Apostel”. Philosophica 67: 115-146.

Batens, Diderik. 2001. “A Universally Abnormality-Adaptive Logic”. Logical Investigations 8: 256–265.

D’Hanis, Isabel. 2001. “The Use Of Metaphors In Scientific Development: A Logical Approach”. Logique et analyse 44: 215–235.

Meheus, Joke. 2000. “On The Acceptance Of Problem Solutions Derived From Inconsistent Constraints”. Logic and Logical Philosophy 8: 33–46.

Batens, Diderik, and Joke Meheus. 2000. “The Adaptive Logic Of Compatibility”. Studia Logica 66: 327–348.

Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. 2000. “Alternative Mathematics: The Vague Way.” Décio Krause, French, Steven, and Doria, Francisco A. Festschrift in honor of Newton C.A. da Costa on the occasion of his seventieth birthday 125: 19–31.

Meheus, Joke. 2000. “Analogical Reasoning In Creative Problem Solving Processes: Logico-Philosophical Perspectives” Fernand Hallyn. Metaphor and Analogy in the Sciences: 17–34.

Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. 2000. “Analogy And Metaphor As Essential Tools For The Working Mathematician” Fernand Hallyn. Metaphor and Analogy in the Sciences: 105–123.

Christiaens, Wim. 2000. “De Eenheid Van De Inhoud” Leo Apostel. Natuurfilosofie. Voorbereidend werk voor een op de fysica gebaseerde ontologie: 9-35.

Batens, Diderik. 2000. “On The Epistemological Justification Of Pluralism And Tolerance”. Philosophica 65: 33–54.

Meheus, Joke. 2000. “An Extremely Rich Paraconsistent Logic And The Adaptive Logic Based On It” Diderik Batens, Mortensen, Chris, Priest, Graham, and Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. Frontiers of Paraconsistent Logic: 189–201.

Batens, Diderik, Chris Mortensen, Graham Priest, and Jean Paul Van Bendegem. 2000. Frontiers of Paraconsistent Logic Frontiers Of Paraconsistent Logic. Baldock, UK: Research Studies Press.

Vanackere, Guido. 2000. “Hl2, An Inconsistency-Adaptive And Inconsistency-Resolving Logic For General Statements That Might Have Exceptions”. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 10: 317–338.

Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. 2000. “Human(Istisch)E Wiskunde Of De Mogelijkheid Van Een Alternatieve Wiskunde.”. De toekomst van het heden : zijn we op weg naar een menselijker samenleving?: 127–140.

Vermeir, Timothy. 2000. “Inconsistency-Adaptive Arithmetic”. Logique et Analyse 42: 221-241.

Batens, Diderik. 2000. “Minimally Abnormal Models In Some Adaptive Logics”. Synthese 125: 5–18.

Batens, Diderik. 2000. “Rich Inconsistency-Adaptive Logics. The Clash Between Heuristic Efficiency And Realistic Reconstruction” Eric Grillet and Beets, François. Logique en perspective. Mélanges offerts à Paul Gochet: 513–543.