Publications
Modal Epistemology. {Koninklijke {V}laamse {A}cademie van {B}elgië.
. 2004. ![](/sites/default/themes/logica/images/biblio.png)
“Default Reasoning In The Correction Of Falsified System Descriptions”. Logique et Analyse 37: 13–22.
. 1996. ![](/sites/default/themes/logica/images/biblio.png)
“How To Study Scientific Explanation?”. Scientific Explanation: 25–37.
. 2013. ![application/pdf](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
“Can Economics Become A Purely Experimental Science? A Comparative Study” . Worldviews, science and us : bridging knowledge and its implications for our perspectives on the world. http://www.worldscibooks.com/general/8341.html.
. 2012. ![](/sites/default/themes/logica/images/biblio.png)
“The Causes And Cures Of Scurvy. How Modern Was James Lind's Methodology?”. Logic and Logical Philosophy 14: 55–67.
. 2005. ![application/pdf](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
![](/sites/default/themes/logica/images/biblio.png)
“Conceptual Tools For Causal Analysis In The Social Sciences.” . Causality and probability in the sciences: 197–213.
. 2007. ![](/sites/default/themes/logica/images/biblio.png)
“Models Of Explanation: An Evaluation Of Their Fruitfulness”. COMMUNICATION & COGNITION : MONOGRAPHIES 25: 339–352.
. 1992. ![](/sites/default/themes/logica/images/biblio.png)
“The Debate Between Causal Realism And Causal Constructivism: Metaphilosophical Reflections”. Philosophica 81: 59–71.
. 2008. ![application/pdf](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
![](/sites/default/themes/logica/images/biblio.png)
“Micro-Explanations Of Laws.”. Structures in Scientific Cognition. Essays in Debate with Theo Kuipers: 177–186.
. 2005. ![](/sites/default/themes/logica/images/biblio.png)
“Prudential Arguments In The Realism Debate.”. Logique et Analyse 41: 301–312.
. 1998. ![](/sites/default/themes/logica/images/biblio.png)
“Assessing The Explanatory Power Of Causal Explanations.” . Rethinking Explanation: 109–118.
. 2007. ![](/sites/default/themes/logica/images/biblio.png)
“Explanation, Understanding And Why-Questions” . Nieuwe tendenzen in de geschiedenis en de filosofie van de wetenschappen: 83-94.
. 1994. ![](/sites/default/themes/logica/images/biblio.png)
“Socialisatie, Sociale Controle En Sociologische Verklaringen Van Menselijke Handelingen.”. TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR SOCIALE WETENSCHAPPEN 38: 61–68.
. 1994. ![](/sites/default/themes/logica/images/biblio.png)
“The Functions Of Intentional Explanations Of Actions”. Behavior and Philosophy 33: 1–16.
. 2005. ![](/sites/default/themes/logica/images/biblio.png)
“Wetenschappelijke Verklaringen En Subjectief Verwacht Nut” . Actueel Filosoferen: 53-60.
. 1993. “De Asymmetrie Van Wetenschappelijke Verklaringen”. Algemeen nederlands tijdschrijft voor wijsbegeerte 81: 47–58.
. 1989. ![](/sites/default/themes/logica/images/biblio.png)
“Wie Rookt Gaat Sneller Dood En Betaalt Dus Meer: Over Het Belang Van Oorzaak-Gevolg-Relaties In Verzekeren En De Moeilijkheid Bij Het Onderzoeken Ervan”. Ethiek en Maatschappij 8: 58–69.
. 2005. ![](/sites/default/themes/logica/images/biblio.png)
“Laudatio Jens Høyrup”. Sartoniana 22: 5–7.
. 2009. ![application/pdf](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
![](/sites/default/themes/logica/images/biblio.png)
“Explaining, Understanding And Scientific Theories”. Erkenntnis (Dordrecht) 44: 1–23.
. 1996. ![](/sites/default/themes/logica/images/biblio.png)
Scientific Explanation. Springer.
. 2013. ![](/sites/default/themes/logica/images/biblio.png)
“Explanatory Proofs In Mathematics”. Logique et Analyse 45: 299–307.
. 2002. ![application/pdf](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
![](/sites/default/themes/logica/images/biblio.png)
“Explaining Laws By Reduction”. In Philosophical Dimensions of Logic and Science, Philosophical Dimensions of Logic and Science, . Dordrecht: Springer.
. 2003. ![](/sites/default/themes/logica/images/biblio.png)
“De Verklarende Kracht Van Statistische Hypothesen” . Acta Filosofiedag 1990: 53-56.
. 1992. ![](/sites/default/themes/logica/images/biblio.png)
“How Probabilistic Causation Can Account For The Use Of Mechanistic Evidence”. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23: 277–-295.
. 2009. ![application/pdf](/modules/file/icons/application-pdf.png)
![](/sites/default/themes/logica/images/biblio.png)
“Why The Logic Of Explanation Is Inconsistency-Adaptive.” . Inconsistency in science: 165–184.
. 2002. ![](/sites/default/themes/logica/images/biblio.png)