Weber, Erik. 1992. “Models Of Explanation: An Evaluation Of Their Fruitfulness”. COMMUNICATION & COGNITION : MONOGRAPHIES 25: 339–352.

De Saeger, David, and Erik Weber. 2011. “Needham's Grand Question Revisited: On The Meaning And Justification Of Causal Claims In The History Of Chinese Science”. East Asian Science, Technology and Medicine 33: 13–32.

Primiero, Giuseppe. 2009. “A Note On Constructive Modalities For Information”. In Logic, Philosophy and History of Science in Belgium. Proceedings of the Young Researchers Days 2008, Logic, Philosophy and History of Science in Belgium. Proceedings of the Young Researchers Days 2008, Erik Weber, Libert, Thierry, Marage, Pierre, and Vanpaemel, Geert. Brussel: Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van België.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2013. “Oneindige Regressieargumenten”. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 105: 1–14.

Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. 1999. “Oorlog En Vrede In Wetenschapsland” Else Walraves and Stuy, Johan. Denken als Openheid. Liber Amicorum Hubert Dethier: 153-160.

Batens, Diderik. 2002. “On A Partial Decision Method For Dynamic Proofs” Hendrik Dekker, Villadsen, Jorgen, and Waragai, Toshiharu. PCL 2002. Paraconsistent Computational Logic 95: 91–108. http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.LO/0207090.

Weber, Erik. 1990. “Phenomenological Laws And Their Application To Scientific Epistemic Explanation Problems”. Logique et Analyse 33: 175–189.

Gervais, Raoul, and Erik Weber. 2013. “Plausibility Versus Richness In Mechanistic Models”. PHILOSOPHICAL PSYCHOLOGY 26: 139–152.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2014. “Pluralists About Pluralism? Different Versions Of Explanatory Pluralism In Psychiatry” Maria Carla Galavotti, Dieks, Dennis, Gonzalez, Wenceslao J, Hartmann, Stephan, Uebel, Thomas, and Weber, Marcel. New directions in the philosophy of science: 104–119.

Weber, Erik. 1998. “The Practical Function And Epistemology Of Causal Beliefs”. Communication & Cognition : Monographies 31: 297–324.

Leuridan, Bert, Erik Weber, and Maarten Van Dyck. 2008. “The Practical Value Of Spurious Correlations: Selective Versus Manipulative Policy”. Analysis 68: 298–303.

Weber, Erik, and Robrecht Vanderbeeken. 2001. “A Pragmatic Approach To The Explanation Of Actions” Jörg Blasius, Hox, J., de Leeuw, E., and Schmidt, P. Social Science Methodology in the New Millenium.

De Langhe, Rogier, Erik Weber, and Jeroen Van Bouwel. 2007. “A Pragmatist Approach To The Plurality Of Explanations In International Relations Theory”. In 6th Pan-European conference on international relations, Proceedings, 6th Pan-European conference on international relations, Proceedings, The Standing Group of International Relations of the ECPR. http://turin.sgir.eu/uploads/De%20Langhe-SGIR%20Rogier%20De%20Langhe%20-%20Erik%20Weber%20-%20Jeroen%20Van%20Bouwel.pdf.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Erik Weber. 2008. “A Pragmatist Defense Of Non-Relativistic Explanatory Pluralism In History And Social Science.”. History and theory 47: 168–182.

Drouet, Isabelle. 2009. “Probabilistic Analyses And The Humean Conception Of The Relationship Between Levels Of Causality” Erik Weber, Libert, Thierry, Marage, Pierre, and Vanpaemel, Geert. Logic, Philosophy and History of Science in Belgium. Proceedings of the Young Researchers Days 2008: 68–72.

De Mol, Liesbeth. 2014. “The Proof Is In The Process: A Preamble For A Philosophy Of Computer-Assisted Mathematics” Maria Carla Galavotti, Dieks, Dennis, Gonzalez, Wenceslao J, Hartmann, Stephan, Uebel, Thomas, and Weber, Marcel. New Directions in the Philosophy of Science 5: 15–33.

Weber, Erik. 2008. “Protagoras En Het Kennistheoretisch Relativisme” Danny Praet. Us and Them. Essays over filosofie, politiek, religie en cultuur van de Antieke Oudheid tot Islam in Europa ter ere van Herman De Ley: 181–192.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2011. “Proto-Regress Argument Schemas”. ISSA 2010 Proceedings: 2000–2007.

Weber, Erik. 1998. “Prudential Arguments In The Realism Debate.”. Logique et Analyse 41: 301–312.

Šešelja, Dunja, and Erik Weber. 2012. “Rationality And Irrationality In The History Of Continental Drift: Was The Hypothesis Of Continental Drift Worthy Of Pursuit?”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43: 147–159.

Weber, Erik. 1999. “Rationality In The Discovery Of Empirical Laws”. Foundations of Science 4: 355–368.

Weber, Erik, and Maarten Van Dyck. 2012. “Rationally Evaluating Inconsistent Theories”. PHILOSOPHICA 86: 83–99.

Weber, Erik. 1995. “Realism And Scientific Explanations” Paul Cortois. The Many Problems of Realism: 43–57.

Urbaniak, Rafal. 2009. “Reasoning With Dynamic Conceptual Frames.” Erik Weber, Libert, Thierry, Marage, Pierre, and Vanpaemel, Geert. Logic, Philosophy and History of Science in Belgium. Proceedings of the Young Researchers Days 2008: 84-89.

Heeffer, Albrecht. 2008. “Regiomontanus And Chinese Mathematics” Erik Weber. PHILOSOPHICA 82: 87–114.