Publications

Search

Show only items where

Author

Type

Term

Year

Keyword

Export 823 results:

] Title Type Year

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

W

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2012. “Can Pyrrhonists Act Normally?”. Philosophical Explorations 15: 227–289.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2008. “What Problem Of Universals”. Philosophica 81: 7–21.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2013. “And So On. Two Theories Of Regress Arguments In Philosophy.”.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2011. “Rules Regresses”. AGPC 2010 Proceedings: 79–92. http://www.illc.uva.nl/agpc/agpc10/.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2013. “Strong And Weak Regress Arguments”. Logique & Analyse 56: 439–461.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2010. “Anti-Positionalism's Regress”. Axiomathes 20: 479–493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10516-010-9097-9.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2013. “Oneindige Regressieargumenten”. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 105: 1–14.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2012. “De Pyrronistische Zaak”. Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 74: 523–532.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2013. “Is Justification Dialectical?”. International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 3: 182–201.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2011. “The Sceptic's Tools: Circularity And Infinite Regress”. Philosophical Papers 40: 359–369.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2014. “Sceptical Rationality”. Analytic Philosophy 55: 222–238.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2012. “Carving The World As We Please”. Philosophica 84: 7–24.

Wieland, Jan Willem, and Erik Weber. 2010. “Metaphysical Explanatory Asymmetries”. Logique et Analyse 53: 345–365.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2013. “What CarrollS Tortoise Actually Proves”. Ethical theory and moral practice 16: 983–997.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2011. “Filling A Typical Gap In A Regress Argument”. Logique & Analyse 54: 589–597.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2014. “Internalism Does Entail Scepticism” Erik Weber, Wouters, Dietlinde, and Meheus, Joke. Logic, Reasoning, and Rationality 5: 247-260.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2012. “Regress Argument Reconstruction”. Argumentation 26: 489-503.

Wieland, Jan Willem, and Arianna Betti. 2008. “Relata-Specific Relations: A Response To Vallicella”. Dialectica 62: 509–524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.2008.01167.x.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2013. “Belief And Truth: A Skeptic Reading Of Plato, By Katja Maria Vogt (Review).”. Mind 122: 1204–1207.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2011. “Proto-Regress Argument Schemas”. ISSA 2010 Proceedings: 2000–2007.

Weber, Erik, and Helena De Preester. 2005. “Micro-Explanations Of Laws.”. Structures in Scientific Cognition. Essays in Debate with Theo Kuipers: 177–186.

Weber, Erik. 2008. “The Debate Between Causal Realism And Causal Constructivism: Metaphilosophical Reflections”. Philosophica 81: 59–71.

Weber, Erik, and Jeroen Van Bouwel. 2007. “Assessing The Explanatory Power Of Causal Explanations.” J. Persson and Ylikoski, Petri. Rethinking Explanation: 109–118.

Weber, Erik. 1998. “Prudential Arguments In The Realism Debate.”. Logique et Analyse 41: 301–312.

Weber, Erik, and Robrecht Vanderbeeken. 2005. “The Functions Of Intentional Explanations Of Actions”. Behavior and Philosophy 33: 1–16.

Pages