Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Erik Weber. 2008. “De-Ontologizing The Debate On Social Explanations: A Pragmatic Approach Based On Epistemic Interests.”. Human Studies 31: 423–442.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2008. “Explanatory Pluralism.” Edward Fullbrook. Pluralist Economics: 151-170.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Erik Weber. 2008. “A Pragmatist Defense Of Non-Relativistic Explanatory Pluralism In History And Social Science.”. History and theory 47: 168–182.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2007. “The Ambiguity Of Unification In The Social Sciences.”. In 2e Congrès de la Société de Philosophie des Sciences, 2e Congrès de la Société de Philosophie des Sciences,.

Weber, Erik, and Jeroen Van Bouwel. 2007. “Assessing The Explanatory Power Of Causal Explanations.” J. Persson and Ylikoski, Petri. Rethinking Explanation: 109–118.

De Langhe, Rogier, Erik Weber, and Jeroen Van Bouwel. 2007. “A Pragmatist Approach To The Plurality Of Explanations In International Relations Theory”. In 6th Pan-European conference on international relations, Proceedings, 6th Pan-European conference on international relations, Proceedings, The Standing Group of International Relations of the ECPR. http://turin.sgir.eu/uploads/De%20Langhe-SGIR%20Rogier%20De%20Langhe%20-%20Erik%20Weber%20-%20Jeroen%20Van%20Bouwel.pdf.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2006. “De Idee Van Emergentie In De Sociologie: Perspectieven En Problemen”. Tijdschrijft voor sociologie 27: 337–350.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2006. “The Division Of Labour In The Social Sciences Versus The Politics Of Metaphysics. Questioning Critical Realism's Interdisciplinarity”. Graduate Journal of Social Science 2: 32–39.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2006. “The Idea Of Social Mechanisms In Social Scientific Explanations.” John Z Arlsdale. Progress in Social Psychology Research: 83–95.

Weber, Erik, and Jeroen Van Bouwel. 2005. “Coping With Inconsistencies: Examples From The Social Sciences”. Logic and logical philosophy 14: 89–101.

Weber, Erik, Jeroen Van Bouwel, and Robrecht Vanderbeeken. 2005. “Forms Of Causal Explanation”. Foundations of science 10: 437–454.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2005. “Heeft Er Iemand Een Wetenschapsbeleid Gezien? Over Wetenschap, Democratie En De Onderzoeksagenda”. Samenleving en politiek 12: 12–18. http://www.stichtinggerritkreveld.be/ECMS\_CLIENT/configuration/pages/artikel.php?aid=307.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2005. “Towards A Framework For Pluralisms In Economics”. Post-Autistic Economics Review 30: 24–27.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2004. “The Consequences Of Scientific Pluralism For Science Policy”. In Proceedings of V Jornadas Latinoamericanas de estudios sociales de la ciencia y de la tecnología, Proceedings of V Jornadas Latinoamericanas de estudios sociales de la ciencia y de la tecnología,.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2004. “Explanatory Pluralism In Economics: Against The Mainstream?”. Philosophical Explorations 7: 299–315.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2004. “Imperialistische Tendensen In De Economiebeoefening En Politieke Wetenschappen. Over Heterodoxie En Pluralisme In De Sociale Wetenschappen”. Ethiek & maatschappij 7: 32–45.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2004. “Questioning Structurism As A New Standard For Social Scientific Explanations”. Graduate Journal of Social Science 1: 204–226.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2003. “Verklaringspluralisme In De Sociale Wetenschappen”. Belgisch tijdschrift voor nieuwste geschiedenis – Revue belge d’histoire 33: 303–311.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2003. “Verklaringspluralisme In De Sociale Wetenschappen. Een Wetenschapsfilosofische Verdediging Met Toepassingen In De Geschiedbeoefening, De Theorie Van Internationale Relaties En De Economische Wetenschappen”.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2003. “When Unveiling The Epistemic Fallacy Ends With Committing The Ontological Fallacy. On The Contribution Of Critical Realism To The Social Scientific Explanatory Practice”. Philosophica 71: 81–98.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Erik Weber. 2002. “The Living Apart Together Relationship Between Causation And Explanation. A Comment On Jean Lachappelle.”. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32: 560-569.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Erik Weber. 2002. “Remote Causes, Bad Explanations?”. The Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 32: 437-449.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Barbara Verdonck. 2002. “Subject Ingebed? Over Het Methodologisch Individualisme In De Sociale Wetenschappen.” Rob Devos and Braeckman, Antoon. De terugkeer van het subject? Recente Ontwikkelingen binnen de filosofie: 169–179.

Weber, Erik, and Jeroen Van Bouwel. 2002. “Symposium On Explanation And Social Ontology 3: Can We Dispense With Structural Explanations Of Social Facts?”. Economics and Philosophy 18: 259–275.