Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. 1998. “What, If Anything, Is An Experiment In Mathematics?” Dionysios Anapolitanos, Baltas, Aristides, and Tsinorema, Stavroula. Philosophy and the Many Faces of Science: 172–182.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2012. “What Is There Beyond Mertonian And Dollar Green Science? Exploring The Contours Of Epistemic Democracy” Robrecht Vanderbeeken, Le Roy, Frederik, Stalpaert, Christel, and Aerts, Diederik. Drunk on capitalism : an interdisciplinary reflection on market economy, art and science 11: 35–48.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2008. “What Problem Of Universals”. Philosophica 81: 7–21.

Blancke, Stefaan, and Laszlo Kosolosky. Submitted. “What Science Is Fair? Representations Of Science In A Dutch Creationist Campaign”. Public Understanding of Science.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2003. “When Unveiling The Epistemic Fallacy Ends With Committing The Ontological Fallacy. On The Contribution Of Critical Realism To The Social Scientific Explanatory Practice”. Philosophica 71: 81–98.

Boudry, Maarten, and Bert Leuridan. 2011. “Where The Design Argument Goes Wrong: Auxiliary Assumptions And Unification”. Philosophy of Science 78: 558–578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/661753.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2009. “Where The Epistemic And The Political Meet.” Jeroen Van Bouwel. The Social Sciences and Democracy: 1–13.

Ducheyne, Steffen. 2009. “Whewell, Necessity And The Inductive Sciences: A Philosophical-Systematic Survey”. South African Journal of Philosophy 28: 333–358.

Ducheyne, Steffen. 2008. “Whewell's Metaphorical Usage Of Light And The Ultimate Reality Underlying It”. Semiotica 172: 269–278.

Meheus, Joke, Christian Straßer, and Peter Verdée. 2016. “Which Style Of Reasoning To Choose In The Face Of Conflicting Information?”. Journal of Logic and Computation 26: 361--380.

Kosolosky, Laszlo. 2011. “Who Guards The Guardians/experts? Philosophers?”. In 32e Vlaams-Nederlandse Filosofiedag, Proceedings, 32e Vlaams-Nederlandse Filosofiedag, Proceedings, Ghent University, Department of Philosophy and moral sciences.

De Langhe, Rogier. 2009. “Why Should I Adopt Pluralism?” Rob Garnett, Olsen, Erik, and Starr, Martha. Economic Pluralism.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2010. “Why Social Emergence? Discussing The Use Of Analytical Metaphysics In Social Theory”. In Worldviews, science and us : studies of analytical metaphysics, Worldviews, science and us : studies of analytical metaphysics, Robrecht Vanderbeeken and D'Hooghe, Bart. World Scientific Publishing Company. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789814299053\_0010.

Weber, Erik, and Kristof De Clercq. 2002. “Why The Logic Of Explanation Is Inconsistency-Adaptive.” Joke Meheus. Inconsistency in science: 165–184.

Weber, Erik. 2005. “Wie Rookt Gaat Sneller Dood En Betaalt Dus Meer: Over Het Belang Van Oorzaak-Gevolg-Relaties In Verzekeren En De Moeilijkheid Bij Het Onderzoeken Ervan”. Ethiek en Maatschappij 8: 58–69.

De Mey, Tim, and Dagmar Provijn. 2010. “William Harvey En De Ontdekking Van De Bloedsomloop.” Linda Van Speybroeck and Braeckman, Johan. Fascinerend Leven. Markante Figuren en Ideeën uit de Geschiedenis van de Biologie.

Straßer, Christian, Dunja Šešelja, and Jan Willem Wieland. 2015. “Withstanding Tensions: Scientific Disagreement And Epistemic Tolerance” Emiliano Ippoliti. Heuristic Reasoning 16: 113–146.

De Vreese, Leen. 2010. “Work In Progress In Causal And Probabilistic Reasoning”. The Reasoner 4: 141.

Weber, Erik, and Wim Christiaens. 1999. “World Models And Inconsistencies.”. Foundations of Science 3: 285–311.

Vanackere, Guido. 2006. “A World Of Experiences, An Adequate Language, And Self-Reference Revised” Jacek Malinowski and Pietruszczak, Andrzej. Essays in Logic and Ontology 91: 243–256.

Batens, Diderik, Kristof De Clercq, Peter Verdée, and Joke Meheus. 2009. “Yes Fellows, Most Human Reasoning Is Complex”. Synthese 166: 113–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9268-4.

Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. 1998. “Zeker Lezen: Logica.”. Wijsgerig Perspectief op Maatschappij en Wetenschap 38: 68-69.

Batens, Diderik. 1999. “Zero Logic Adding Up To Classical Logic”. Logical Studies 2: 15.