Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Erik Weber. 2002. “Remote Causes, Bad Explanations?”. The Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 32: 437-449.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2014. “Explanatory Strategies Beyond The Individualism/holism Debate” Collin Finn and Zahle, Julie. Rethinking the individualism-holism debate 372: 153–175.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2007. “The Ambiguity Of Unification In The Social Sciences.”. In 2e Congrès de la Société de Philosophie des Sciences, 2e Congrès de la Société de Philosophie des Sciences,.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2003. “When Unveiling The Epistemic Fallacy Ends With Committing The Ontological Fallacy. On The Contribution Of Critical Realism To The Social Scientific Explanatory Practice”. Philosophica 71: 81–98.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2009. “The Problem With(Out) Consensus: The Scientific Consensus, Deliberative Democracy And Agonistic Pluralism.” Jeroen Van Bouwel. The social sciences and democracy: 121–142.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2003. “Verklaringspluralisme In De Sociale Wetenschappen. Een Wetenschapsfilosofische Verdediging Met Toepassingen In De Geschiedbeoefening, De Theorie Van Internationale Relaties En De Economische Wetenschappen”.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2019. “Do Mechanism-Based Social Explanations Make A Case For Methodological Individualism?”. JOURNAL FOR GENERAL PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE 50: 263–282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10838-019-09446-w.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2005. “Towards A Framework For Pluralisms In Economics”. Post-Autistic Economics Review 30: 24–27.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Erik Weber. 2008. “De-Ontologizing The Debate On Social Explanations: A Pragmatic Approach Based On Epistemic Interests.”. Human Studies 31: 423–442.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2009. “Understanding In Political Science: The Plurality Of Epistemic Interests” Henk De Regt, Leonelli, Sabina, and Eigner, Kai. Scientific Understanding. Philosophical Perspectives: 298–313.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2015. “Towards Democratic Models Of Science: Exploring The Case Of Scientific Pluralism”. Perspectives on science 23: 149–172.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2004. “The Consequences Of Scientific Pluralism For Science Policy”. In Proceedings of V Jornadas Latinoamericanas de estudios sociales de la ciencia y de la tecnología, Proceedings of V Jornadas Latinoamericanas de estudios sociales de la ciencia y de la tecnología,.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Barbara Verdonck. 2002. “Subject Ingebed? Over Het Methodologisch Individualisme In De Sociale Wetenschappen.” Rob Devos and Braeckman, Antoon. De terugkeer van het subject? Recente Ontwikkelingen binnen de filosofie: 169–179.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Michiel Van Oudheusden. 2017. “Participation Beyond Consensus? Technology Assessments, Consensus Conferences And Democratic Modulation. ”. Social Epistemology 31 (6).

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2005. “Heeft Er Iemand Een Wetenschapsbeleid Gezien? Over Wetenschap, Democratie En De Onderzoeksagenda”. Samenleving en politiek 12: 12–18. http://www.stichtinggerritkreveld.be/ECMS\_CLIENT/configuration/pages/artikel.php?aid=307.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Erik Weber. 2008. “A Pragmatist Defense Of Non-Relativistic Explanatory Pluralism In History And Social Science.”. History and theory 47: 168–182.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2006. “The Idea Of Social Mechanisms In Social Scientific Explanations.” John Z Arlsdale. Progress in Social Psychology Research: 83–95.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2012. “What Is There Beyond Mertonian And Dollar Green Science? Exploring The Contours Of Epistemic Democracy” Robrecht Vanderbeeken, Le Roy, Frederik, Stalpaert, Christel, and Aerts, Diederik. Drunk on capitalism : an interdisciplinary reflection on market economy, art and science 11: 35–48.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2004. “Questioning Structurism As A New Standard For Social Scientific Explanations”. Graduate Journal of Social Science 1: 204–226.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, Erik Weber, and Leen De Vreese. 2011. “Indispensability Arguments In Favour Of Reductive Explanations”. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 42: 33–46.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2014. “Pluralists About Pluralism? Different Versions Of Explanatory Pluralism In Psychiatry” Maria Carla Galavotti, Dieks, Dennis, Gonzalez, Wenceslao J, Hartmann, Stephan, Uebel, Thomas, and Weber, Marcel. New directions in the philosophy of science: 104–119.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2006. “De Idee Van Emergentie In De Sociologie: Perspectieven En Problemen”. Tijdschrijft voor sociologie 27: 337–350.

Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. 1998. “Schoonheid In De Wiskunde: Birkhoff Revisited”. Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 60: 106–130.

Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. 2002. “Inconsistencies In The History Of Mathematics: The Case Of Infinitesimals.” Joke Meheus. Inconsistency in Science 2: 43–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0085-6_3.

Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. 1996. “The Strange Case Of The Missing Body Of Mathematics”. Semiotica 112: 403–413.