Van De Putte, Frederik, Mathieu Beirlaen, and Joke Meheus. 2019. “Adaptive Deontic Logics: A Survey”. IfCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications 6: 523-608. http://www.collegepublications.co.uk/downloads/ifcolog00032.pdf.

Van De Putte, Frederik. 2012. “Generic Formats For Prioritized Adaptive Logics. With Applications In Deontic Logic, Abduction And Belief Revision”.

Van De Putte, Frederik, Mathieu Beirlaen, and Joke Meheus. In Press. “Adaptive Deontic Logics”. Handbook of Deontic Logic and Normative Systems 2.

Van De Putte, Frederik. In Press. “Coarse Deontic Logic”. Journal of Logic and Computation.

Van De Putte, Frederik. 2011. “Hierarchic Adaptive Logics”. Logic Journal of the IGPL 20: 45–72.

Van De Putte, Frederik. 2018. Choosing The Right Concept Of "right Choices" (Technical Report).

Van De Putte, Frederik, and Christian Straßer. 2014. “Adaptive Logics: A Parametric Approach”. Logic Journal of the IGPL 22: 905-932. + http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzu017.

Van De Putte, Frederik, and Peter Verdée. 2012. “The Dynamics Of Relevance: Adaptive Belief Revision”. Synthese 187: 1-42.

Van De Putte, Frederik. 2016. “Coarse Deontic Logic (Short Version)”. In Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, College Publications.

Van De Putte, Frederik. 2016. “Splitting And Relevance: Broadening The Scope Of Parikh's Concepts”. Logique et Analyse 59(234): 173 -205.

Van De Putte, Frederik, and Dominik Klein. 2018. “Pointwise Intersection In Neighbourhood Modal Logic”.

Van De Putte, Frederik, and Christian Straßer. 2012. “Extending The Standard Format Of Adaptive Logics To The Prioritized Case”. Logique et Analyse 55: 601–641.

Van De Putte, Frederik, and Dominik Klein. Submitted. “Pooling Modalities And Pointwise Intersection: Semantics, Expressivity, And Applications”.

Van De Putte, Frederik. 2016. “Obligation As Weakest Permission: A Strongly Complete Axiomatization”. Rew. Symb. Logic 9: 370-379.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2003. “When Unveiling The Epistemic Fallacy Ends With Committing The Ontological Fallacy. On The Contribution Of Critical Realism To The Social Scientific Explanatory Practice”. Philosophica 71: 81–98.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2009. “The Problem With(Out) Consensus: The Scientific Consensus, Deliberative Democracy And Agonistic Pluralism.” Jeroen Van Bouwel. The social sciences and democracy: 121–142.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2005. “Towards A Framework For Pluralisms In Economics”. Post-Autistic Economics Review 30: 24–27.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Erik Weber. 2008. “De-Ontologizing The Debate On Social Explanations: A Pragmatic Approach Based On Epistemic Interests.”. Human Studies 31: 423–442.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2009. “Understanding In Political Science: The Plurality Of Epistemic Interests” Henk De Regt, Leonelli, Sabina, and Eigner, Kai. Scientific Understanding. Philosophical Perspectives: 298–313.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2015. “Towards Democratic Models Of Science: Exploring The Case Of Scientific Pluralism”. Perspectives on science 23: 149–172.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2004. “The Consequences Of Scientific Pluralism For Science Policy”. In Proceedings of V Jornadas Latinoamericanas de estudios sociales de la ciencia y de la tecnología, Proceedings of V Jornadas Latinoamericanas de estudios sociales de la ciencia y de la tecnología,.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Barbara Verdonck. 2002. “Subject Ingebed? Over Het Methodologisch Individualisme In De Sociale Wetenschappen.” Rob Devos and Braeckman, Antoon. De terugkeer van het subject? Recente Ontwikkelingen binnen de filosofie: 169–179.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Michiel Van Oudheusden. 2017. “Beyond Consensus? A Reply To Alan Irwin”. SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY REVIEW AND REPLY COLLECTIVE 6: 48–53.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2005. “Heeft Er Iemand Een Wetenschapsbeleid Gezien? Over Wetenschap, Democratie En De Onderzoeksagenda”. Samenleving en politiek 12: 12–18. http://www.stichtinggerritkreveld.be/ECMS\_CLIENT/configuration/pages/artikel.php?aid=307.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Erik Weber. 2008. “A Pragmatist Defense Of Non-Relativistic Explanatory Pluralism In History And Social Science.”. History and theory 47: 168–182.