Van De Putte, Frederik, and Christian Straßer. 2014. “Adaptive Logics: A Parametric Approach”. Logic Journal of the IGPL 22: 905-932. + http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzu017.

Van De Putte, Frederik, Allard Tamminga, and Hein Duijf. 2018. “The Best We Can Do (Extended Abstract, Submitted To Loft)”.

Van De Putte, Frederik, Mathieu Beirlaen, and Joke Meheus. 2019. “Adaptive Deontic Logics: A Survey”. IfCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications 6: 523-608. http://www.collegepublications.co.uk/downloads/ifcolog00032.pdf.

Van De Putte, Frederik. 2013. “Prime Implicates And Relevant Belief Revision”. Journal of Logic and Computation 23: 109–119.

Van De Putte, Frederik. 2016. “Coarse Deontic Logic (Short Version)”. In Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, College Publications.

Van De Putte, Frederik, and Christian Straßer. 2013. “Three Formats Of Prioritized Adaptive Logics: A Comparative Study”. Logic journal of the IGPL 21: 127–159.

Van De Putte, Frederik. 2018. Choosing The Right Concept Of "right Choices" (Technical Report).

Van De Putte, Frederik. 2016. “Obligation As Weakest Permission: A Strongly Complete Axiomatization”. Rew. Symb. Logic 9: 370-379.

Van De Putte, Frederik. 2011. “Hierarchic Adaptive Logics”. Logic Journal of the IGPL 20: 45–72.

Van De Putte, Frederik, and Dominik Klein. 2018. “Pointwise Intersection In Neighbourhood Modal Logic”.

Van De Putte, Frederik. 2017. “That Will Do: Logics Of Deontic Necessity And Sufficiency”. Erkenntnis 82: 473–511.

Van De Putte, Frederik, and Peter Verdée. 2012. “The Dynamics Of Relevance: Adaptive Belief Revision”. Synthese 187: 1-42.

Van De Putte, Frederik. 2017. “Free Choice Permission In Stit”. Logica Yearbook 2016: 289--303.

Van De Putte, Frederik, and Dominik Klein. Submitted. “Pooling Modalities And Pointwise Intersection: Semantics, Expressivity, And Applications”.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2009. “Where The Epistemic And The Political Meet.” Jeroen Van Bouwel. The Social Sciences and Democracy: 1–13.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2004. “Imperialistische Tendensen In De Economiebeoefening En Politieke Wetenschappen. Over Heterodoxie En Pluralisme In De Sociale Wetenschappen”. Ethiek & maatschappij 7: 32–45.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Erik Weber. 2002. “Remote Causes, Bad Explanations?”. The Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 32: 437-449.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2014. “Explanatory Strategies Beyond The Individualism/holism Debate” Collin Finn and Zahle, Julie. Rethinking the individualism-holism debate 372: 153–175.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2007. “The Ambiguity Of Unification In The Social Sciences.”. In 2e Congrès de la Société de Philosophie des Sciences, 2e Congrès de la Société de Philosophie des Sciences,.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2003. “When Unveiling The Epistemic Fallacy Ends With Committing The Ontological Fallacy. On The Contribution Of Critical Realism To The Social Scientific Explanatory Practice”. Philosophica 71: 81–98.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2009. “The Problem With(Out) Consensus: The Scientific Consensus, Deliberative Democracy And Agonistic Pluralism.” Jeroen Van Bouwel. The social sciences and democracy: 121–142.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2005. “Towards A Framework For Pluralisms In Economics”. Post-Autistic Economics Review 30: 24–27.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Erik Weber. 2008. “De-Ontologizing The Debate On Social Explanations: A Pragmatic Approach Based On Epistemic Interests.”. Human Studies 31: 423–442.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Michiel Van Oudheusden. 2017. “Beyond Consensus? A Reply To Alan Irwin”. SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY REVIEW AND REPLY COLLECTIVE 6: 48–53.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2009. “Understanding In Political Science: The Plurality Of Epistemic Interests” Henk De Regt, Leonelli, Sabina, and Eigner, Kai. Scientific Understanding. Philosophical Perspectives: 298–313.