Publications
“Hierarchic Adaptive Logics”. Logic Journal of the IGPL 20: 45–72.
. 2011. “That Will Do: Logics Of Deontic Necessity And Sufficiency”. Erkenntnis 82: 473–511.
. 2017. “Free Choice Permission In Stit”. Logica Yearbook 2016: 289--303.
. 2017. “The Dynamics Of Relevance: Adaptive Belief Revision”. Synthese 187: 1-42.
. 2012. “How To Take Heroin (If At All). A New Approach To Detachment In Deontic Logic” . Deontic Logic and Normative Systems: 14th International Conference: 317-335.
. 2018. “Doing Without Nature”. In Logic, Rationality, and Interaction (LORI), Logic, Rationality, and Interaction (LORI), Sapporro: Springer.
. 2017. “Pooling Modalities And Pointwise Intersection: Axiomatization And Decidability”. Studia Logica online first.
. 2020. “Splitting And Relevance: Broadening The Scope Of Parikh's Concepts”. Logique et Analyse 59(234): 173 -205.
. 2016. . Submitted.
“Adaptive Deontic Logics”. Handbook of Deontic Logic and Normative Systems 2.
. In Press. “Extending The Standard Format Of Adaptive Logics To The Prioritized Case”. Logique et Analyse 55: 601–641.
. 2012. “Coarse Deontic Logic”. Journal of Logic and Computation.
. In Press. “Default Assumptions And Selection Functions: A Generic Framework For Non-Monotonic Logics”. Proceedings of MICAI2013, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 8264: 54-67.
. 2013. “The Problem With(Out) Consensus: The Scientific Consensus, Deliberative Democracy And Agonistic Pluralism.” . The social sciences and democracy: 121–142.
. 2009. “Towards A Framework For Pluralisms In Economics”. Post-Autistic Economics Review 30: 24–27.
. 2005. “De-Ontologizing The Debate On Social Explanations: A Pragmatic Approach Based On Epistemic Interests.”. Human Studies 31: 423–442.
. 2008. “Understanding In Political Science: The Plurality Of Epistemic Interests” . Scientific Understanding. Philosophical Perspectives: 298–313.
. 2009. “Towards Democratic Models Of Science: Exploring The Case Of Scientific Pluralism”. Perspectives on science 23: 149–172.
. 2015. “Do Mechanism-Based Social Explanations Make A Case For Methodological Individualism?”. JOURNAL FOR GENERAL PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE 50: 263–282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10838-019-09446-w.
. 2019. “The Consequences Of Scientific Pluralism For Science Policy”. In Proceedings of V Jornadas Latinoamericanas de estudios sociales de la ciencia y de la tecnología, Proceedings of V Jornadas Latinoamericanas de estudios sociales de la ciencia y de la tecnología,.
. 2004. “Subject Ingebed? Over Het Methodologisch Individualisme In De Sociale Wetenschappen.” . De terugkeer van het subject? Recente Ontwikkelingen binnen de filosofie: 169–179.
. 2002. “Heeft Er Iemand Een Wetenschapsbeleid Gezien? Over Wetenschap, Democratie En De Onderzoeksagenda”. Samenleving en politiek 12: 12–18. http://www.stichtinggerritkreveld.be/ECMS\_CLIENT/configuration/pages/artikel.php?aid=307.
. 2005. “A Pragmatist Defense Of Non-Relativistic Explanatory Pluralism In History And Social Science.”. History and theory 47: 168–182.
. 2008. “The Idea Of Social Mechanisms In Social Scientific Explanations.” . Progress in Social Psychology Research: 83–95.
. 2006.