Drouet, Isabelle. 2009. “Probabilistic Analyses And The Humean Conception Of The Relationship Between Levels Of Causality” Erik Weber, Libert, Thierry, Marage, Pierre, and Vanpaemel, Geert. Logic, Philosophy and History of Science in Belgium. Proceedings of the Young Researchers Days 2008: 68–72.

Lefevere, Merel, and Eric Schliesser. 2015. “Private Epistemic Virtue, Public Vices: Moral Responsibility In The Policy Sciences” Carlo Martini and Boumans, Marcel. Experts and consensus in social science: 275–295.

Primiero, Giuseppe. 2009. “Prioritized Dynamic Retraction Function On Non-Monotonic Information Updates” Walter A Carnielli, Coniglio, Marcelo E, and D'Ottaviano, Itala MLoffred. The Many Sides of Logic: 443-463.

Van De Putte, Frederik. 2013. “Prime Implicates And Relevant Belief Revision”. Journal of Logic and Computation 23: 109–119.

Ducheyne, Steffen. 2008. “A Preliminary Study Of The Appropriation Of Van Helmont's Oeuvre In Britain In Chymistry, Medicine And Natural Philosophy”. Ambix 55: 122–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/174582308X255479.

Van De Putte, Frederik, and Christian Straßer. 2013. “Preferential Semantics Using Non-Smooth Preference Relations”. Journal of Philosophical Logic 43: 903–942.

Vanackere, Guido. 2001. “Preferences As Inconsistency-Resolvers: An Inconsistency-Adaptive Tool”. Logic and Logical Philosophy 8: 47–63.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Erik Weber. 2008. “A Pragmatist Defense Of Non-Relativistic Explanatory Pluralism In History And Social Science.”. History and theory 47: 168–182.

De Langhe, Rogier, Erik Weber, and Jeroen Van Bouwel. 2007. “A Pragmatist Approach To The Plurality Of Explanations In International Relations Theory”. In 6th Pan-European conference on international relations, Proceedings, 6th Pan-European conference on international relations, Proceedings, The Standing Group of International Relations of the ECPR. http://turin.sgir.eu/uploads/De%20Langhe-SGIR%20Rogier%20De%20Langhe%20-%20Erik%20Weber%20-%20Jeroen%20Van%20Bouwel.pdf.

Gervais, Raoul. 2012. “Pragmatic Approaches To Explanation Applied To The Cognitive Sciences: Two Types Of Explanation-Seeking Questions Compared” Bart Van Kerkhove, Libert, Thierry, Vanpaemel, Geert, and Marage, Pierre. Logic, Philosophy and History of Science in Belgium II: 131–137.

Weber, Erik, and Robrecht Vanderbeeken. 2001. “A Pragmatic Approach To The Explanation Of Actions” Jörg Blasius, Hox, J., de Leeuw, E., and Schmidt, P. Social Science Methodology in the New Millenium.

De Winter, Jan. 2010. “A Pragmatic Account Of Functions”. Ghent University, Ghent. http://logica.ugent.be/centrum/preprints/De_Winter_-_Functional_Explanation__DRAFT_24_.pdf.

Leuridan, Bert, Erik Weber, and Maarten Van Dyck. 2008. “The Practical Value Of Spurious Correlations: Selective Versus Manipulative Policy”. Analysis 68: 298–303.

Weber, Erik. 1998. “The Practical Function And Epistemology Of Causal Beliefs”. Communication & Cognition : Monographies 31: 297–324.

De Mol, Liesbeth. 2006. “Post'’S Machine”.

Batens, Diderik. 2008. “On Possibilities And Thought Experiments” Robert Almeder. Rescher Studies. A Collection of Essays on the Philosophical Work of Nicholas Rescher: 29–57.

Van De Putte, Frederik, and Dominik Klein. Submitted. “Pooling Modalities And Pointwise Intersection: Semantics, Expressivity, And Applications”.

Van De Putte, Frederik. Submitted. “Pooling Modalities And Pointwise Intersection: Semantics, Expressivity, And Applications” Dominik Klein.

Van De Putte, Frederik, and Dominik Klein. 2020. “Pooling Modalities And Pointwise Intersection: Axiomatization And Decidability”. Studia Logica online first.

Van De Putte, Frederik, and Dominik Klein. 2018. “Pointwise Intersection In Neighbourhood Modal Logic”.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2014. “Pluralists About Pluralism? Different Versions Of Explanatory Pluralism In Psychiatry” Maria Carla Galavotti, Dieks, Dennis, Gonzalez, Wenceslao J, Hartmann, Stephan, Uebel, Thomas, and Weber, Marcel. New directions in the philosophy of science: 104–119.

De Vreese, Leen. 2006. “Pluralisme Versus Monisme In Het Filosofische Debat Over Causaliteit. Naar Een Zinvolle Pluralistische Benadering Van Causaliteit Als Theoretisch Kader Voor De Explicatie Van Causaal Redeneren.”.

Batens, Diderik. 2017. “Pluralism In Scientific Problem Solving. Why Inconsistency Is No Big Deal”. Humana.Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies 32: 149–177.

Urbaniak, Rafal. 2014. “Plural Quantifiers: A Modal Interpretation”. Synthese 191: 1605–1626.

Gervais, Raoul, and Erik Weber. 2013. “Plausibility Versus Richness In Mechanistic Models”. PHILOSOPHICAL PSYCHOLOGY 26: 139–152.