Anglberger, Albert, Federico LG Faroldi, and Johannes Korbmacher. 2016. “An Exact Truthmaker Semantics For Obligation And Permission”. Deontic Logic and Normative Systems: 2016.

Verhoeven, Liza, and Leon Horsten. 2005. “On The Exclusivity Implicature Of `or' Or On The Meaning Of Eating Strawberries”. Studia Logica 81: 19-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11225-005-2767-8.

Kosolosky, Laszlo. 2010. “Expertise Doordacht: Reflectie Via Klimaatanalyse”. Ethiek en Maatschappij 13: 72–82.

Gervais, Raoul. 2014. “Explaining Capacities: Assessing The Explanatory Power Of Models In The Cognitive Sciences” Erik Weber, Wouters, Dietlinde, and Meheus, Joke. Logic, Reasoning, and Rationality: 45-57.

Weber, Erik. 2003. “Explaining Laws By Reduction”. In Philosophical Dimensions of Logic and Science, Philosophical Dimensions of Logic and Science, A Rojsczak, Cachro, J, and Kurczewski, G. Dordrecht: Springer.

Weber, Erik. 1996. “Explaining, Understanding And Scientific Theories”. Erkenntnis (Dordrecht) 44: 1–23.

De Mey, Tim, and Erik Weber. 2003. “Explanation And Thought Experiments In History.”. History and Theory 42: 28–38.

Gervais, Raoul. 2013. “Explanation In The Cognitive Sciences And Biology: Mechanisms, Laws And Their Explanatory Virtues”.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen, and Erik Weber. 2011. “Explanation In The Social Sciences” Ian Jarvie and Zamora-Bonilla, Jesus. The SAGE Handbook of the Philosophy of the Social Sciences: 632–646.

Weber, Erik. 1994. “Explanation, Understanding And Why-Questions” Robert Halleux and Bernés, Anne-Cathérine. Nieuwe tendenzen in de geschiedenis en de filosofie van de wetenschappen: 83-94.

De Winter, Jan. 2010. “Explanations In Software Engineering: The Pragmatic Point Of View” James H Moor. Minds and Machines 20: 277–289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11023-010-9190-2.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2008. “Explanatory Pluralism.” Edward Fullbrook. Pluralist Economics: 151-170.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2004. “Explanatory Pluralism In Economics: Against The Mainstream?”. Philosophical Explorations 7: 299–315.

De Vreese, Leen, Erik Weber, and Jeroen Van Bouwel. 2010. “Explanatory Pluralism In The Medical Sciences: Theory And Practice”. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31: 371–390.

Weber, Erik, and Liza Verhoeven. 2002. “Explanatory Proofs In Mathematics”. Logique et Analyse 45: 299–307.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2014. “Explanatory Strategies Beyond The Individualism/holism Debate” Collin Finn and Zahle, Julie. Rethinking the individualism-holism debate 372: 153–175.

Kosolosky, Laszlo, and Jeroen Van Bouwel. 2015. “Explicating Ways Of Consensus-Making In Science And Society: Distinguishing The Academic, The Interface And The Meta-Consensus” Carlo Martini and Boumans, Marcel. Experts and consensus in social science: 71–92.

Van De Putte, Frederik, and Christian Straßer. 2012. “Extending The Standard Format Of Adaptive Logics To The Prioritized Case”. Logique et Analyse 55: 601–641.

Meheus, Joke. 2000. “An Extremely Rich Paraconsistent Logic And The Adaptive Logic Based On It” Diderik Batens, Mortensen, Chris, Priest, Graham, and Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. Frontiers of Paraconsistent Logic: 189–201.

De Mol, Liesbeth. 2006. “Facing The Computer. Some Techniques To Understand Technique.”. In Computers and Philosophy, an International Conference, Computers and Philosophy, an International Conference, C. TA Schmidt. EOARD.

Heeffer, Albrecht. 2007. “Father Henri Bosmans (S.j.) A Belgian Pioneer In The History Of Mathematics”. History and Pedagogy of Mathematics Newsletter 65: 12–15.

Gauderis, Tjerk. In Press. “The Feasibility Of Modeling Hypothetical Reasoning By Formal Logics. Including An Overview Of Adaptive Logics For Singular Fact Abduction” Lorenzo Magnani and Bertolotti, Tommaso. Handbook of Model-Based Science.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2011. “Filling A Typical Gap In A Regress Argument”. Logique & Analyse 54: 589–597.

Lycke, Hans. 2009. “Fitch-Style Natural Deduction For Modal Paralogics”. Logique et Analyse 207: 193–218.

Ducheyne, Steffen. 2009. “The Flow Of Influence: From Newton To Locke … And Back”. Rivista di storia della filosofia 64: 265–288.