Horsten, Leon, Igor Douven, and Erik Weber. 2007. Wetenschapsfilosofie. Koninklijke Van Gorcum.

Weber, Erik. 1994. “Waarom Wesley Salmons Causaal-Mechanische Model Van Verklaring Niet Volstaat” Jean Paul Van Bendegem and Cornelis, Gustaaf C. Iedereen die niet denkt zoals ik, volge mij. Acta 16de Nederlands-Vlaamse Filosofiedag: 81-86.

Batens, Diderik. 1986. “Wetenschap En Vrijzinnige Waarden”. De specificiteit van Vrijzinnig Humanistische Waarden: 1–14.

Weber, Erik. 1993. “Wetenschappelijke Verklaringen En Subjectief Verwacht Nut” Wim van Dooren and Hoff, Tineke. Actueel Filosoferen: 53-60.

Vanderbeeken, Robrecht. 2010. “What About Interdisciplinarity Within Philosophy?” Diederik Aerts. Worldviews, Science and Us: Bridging Knowledge and Its Implications For Our Perspectives on the World: 10–25.

Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. 1998. “What, If Anything, Is An Experiment In Mathematics?” Dionysios Anapolitanos, Baltas, Aristides, and Tsinorema, Stavroula. Philosophy and the Many Faces of Science: 172–182.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2012. “What Is There Beyond Mertonian And Dollar Green Science? Exploring The Contours Of Epistemic Democracy” Robrecht Vanderbeeken, Le Roy, Frederik, Stalpaert, Christel, and Aerts, Diederik. Drunk on capitalism : an interdisciplinary reflection on market economy, art and science 11: 35–48.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2009. “Where The Epistemic And The Political Meet.” Jeroen Van Bouwel. The Social Sciences and Democracy: 1–13.

De Langhe, Rogier. 2009. “Why Should I Adopt Pluralism?” Rob Garnett, Olsen, Erik, and Starr, Martha. Economic Pluralism.

Weber, Erik, and Kristof De Clercq. 2002. “Why The Logic Of Explanation Is Inconsistency-Adaptive.” Joke Meheus. Inconsistency in science: 165–184.

De Mey, Tim, and Dagmar Provijn. 2010. “William Harvey En De Ontdekking Van De Bloedsomloop.” Linda Van Speybroeck and Braeckman, Johan. Fascinerend Leven. Markante Figuren en Ideeën uit de Geschiedenis van de Biologie.

Straßer, Christian, Dunja Šešelja, and Jan Willem Wieland. 2015. “Withstanding Tensions: Scientific Disagreement And Epistemic Tolerance” Emiliano Ippoliti. Heuristic Reasoning 16: 113–146.

Vanackere, Guido. 2006. “A World Of Experiences, An Adequate Language, And Self-Reference Revised” Jacek Malinowski and Pietruszczak, Andrzej. Essays in Logic and Ontology 91: 243–256.

De Mol, Liesbeth, and Maarten Bullynck. 2008. “A Week-End Off: The First Extensive Number-Theoretical Computation On The Eniac”. In Logic and Theory of Algorithms, Logic and Theory of Algorithms, Arnold Beckmann, Dimitracopoulos, Costas, and Löwe, Benedikt. Springer Verlag.

Kosolosky, Laszlo. 2011. “Who Guards The Guardians/experts? Philosophers?”. In 32e Vlaams-Nederlandse Filosofiedag, Proceedings, 32e Vlaams-Nederlandse Filosofiedag, Proceedings, Ghent University, Department of Philosophy and moral sciences.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2010. “Why Social Emergence? Discussing The Use Of Analytical Metaphysics In Social Theory”. In Worldviews, science and us : studies of analytical metaphysics, Worldviews, science and us : studies of analytical metaphysics, Robrecht Vanderbeeken and D'Hooghe, Bart. World Scientific Publishing Company. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789814299053\_0010.

Ducheyne, Steffen. 2010. “Whewell's Tidal Researches: Scientific Practice And Philosophical Methodology”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41: 26–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2009.12.011.

Batens, Diderik. 2010. “Waar Stoppen?”. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 102: 196–198.

Van Bendegem, Jean Paul. 1997. “Wetenschap En Religie: Zo Verzoenbaar Als Men Maar Wil.”. Mores 42: 381-388.

Leuridan, Bert. 2012. “What Are Mechanisms In Social Science? (Review)”. Metascience 21: 395-398.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2013. “What Carroll’S Tortoise Actually Proves”. Ethical theory and moral practice 16: 983–997.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2008. “What Problem Of Universals”. Philosophica 81: 7–21.

Blancke, Stefaan, and Laszlo Kosolosky. Submitted. “What Science Is Fair? Representations Of Science In A Dutch Creationist Campaign”. Public Understanding of Science.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2003. “When Unveiling The Epistemic Fallacy Ends With Committing The Ontological Fallacy. On The Contribution Of Critical Realism To The Social Scientific Explanatory Practice”. Philosophica 71: 81–98.

Boudry, Maarten, and Bert Leuridan. 2011. “Where The Design Argument Goes Wrong: Auxiliary Assumptions And Unification”. Philosophy of Science 78: 558–578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/661753.