Heeffer, Albrecht, and Maarten Van Dyck. 2010. 26 Studies in Logic Philosophical Aspects Of Symbolic Reasoning In Early Modern Mathematics. College Publications.

Batens, Diderik. 2017. “Paradoxen In De Vrijmetselarij En De Relatie Met Waarden” Rik Pinxten and Swings, Jean. Kappen aan de ruwe steen: 319–336.

Batens, Diderik. 2002. “On A Partial Decision Method For Dynamic Proofs” Hendrik Dekker, Villadsen, Jorgen, and Waragai, Toshiharu. PCL 2002. Paraconsistent Computational Logic 95: 91–108. http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.LO/0207090.

Gauderis, Tjerk. 2013. “Pauli's Idea Of The Neutrino: How Models In Physics Allow To Revive Old Ideas For New Purposes” Lorenzo Magnani. Model-based reasoning in science and technology : theoretical and cognitive issues: 449-461.

Pawlowski, Pawel. 2017. “Philosophical Aspects Of An Alleged Connection Between The Axiom Of Choice And Predicting The Future” Rafal Urbaniak and Gillman, Payette. Applications of Formal Philosophy The Road Less Travelled: 213-220.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2014. “Pluralists About Pluralism? Different Versions Of Explanatory Pluralism In Psychiatry” Maria Carla Galavotti, Dieks, Dennis, Gonzalez, Wenceslao J, Hartmann, Stephan, Uebel, Thomas, and Weber, Marcel. New directions in the philosophy of science: 104–119.

Batens, Diderik. 2008. “On Possibilities And Thought Experiments” Robert Almeder. Rescher Studies. A Collection of Essays on the Philosophical Work of Nicholas Rescher: 29–57.

Weber, Erik, and Robrecht Vanderbeeken. 2001. “A Pragmatic Approach To The Explanation Of Actions” Jörg Blasius, Hox, J., de Leeuw, E., and Schmidt, P. Social Science Methodology in the New Millenium.

Gervais, Raoul. 2012. “Pragmatic Approaches To Explanation Applied To The Cognitive Sciences: Two Types Of Explanation-Seeking Questions Compared” Bart Van Kerkhove, Libert, Thierry, Vanpaemel, Geert, and Marage, Pierre. Logic, Philosophy and History of Science in Belgium II: 131–137.

Primiero, Giuseppe. 2009. “Prioritized Dynamic Retraction Function On Non-Monotonic Information Updates” Walter A Carnielli, Coniglio, Marcelo E, and D'Ottaviano, Itala MLoffred. The Many Sides of Logic: 443-463.

Lefevere, Merel, and Eric Schliesser. 2015. “Private Epistemic Virtue, Public Vices: Moral Responsibility In The Policy Sciences” Carlo Martini and Boumans, Marcel. Experts and consensus in social science: 275–295.

Drouet, Isabelle. 2009. “Probabilistic Analyses And The Humean Conception Of The Relationship Between Levels Of Causality” Erik Weber, Libert, Thierry, Marage, Pierre, and Vanpaemel, Geert. Logic, Philosophy and History of Science in Belgium. Proceedings of the Young Researchers Days 2008: 68–72.

Van Bouwel, Jeroen. 2009. “The Problem With(Out) Consensus: The Scientific Consensus, Deliberative Democracy And Agonistic Pluralism.” Jeroen Van Bouwel. The social sciences and democracy: 121–142.

Vanderbeeken, Robrecht, and Kristof De Clercq. 2003. “A Procedure For Generating (Conditional) Answers In A Goal-Directed Way” Claudio Delrieux and Legris, Javier. Computer modeling of scientific reasoning: 57–63.

De Mol, Liesbeth. 2014. “The Proof Is In The Process: A Preamble For A Philosophy Of Computer-Assisted Mathematics” Maria Carla Galavotti, Dieks, Dennis, Gonzalez, Wenceslao J, Hartmann, Stephan, Uebel, Thomas, and Weber, Marcel. New Directions in the Philosophy of Science 5: 15–33.

Weber, Erik. 2008. “Protagoras En Het Kennistheoretisch Relativisme” Danny Praet. Us and Them. Essays over filosofie, politiek, religie en cultuur van de Antieke Oudheid tot Islam in Europa ter ere van Herman De Ley: 181–192.

Wieland, Jan Willem. 2011. “Proto-Regress Argument Schemas”. ISSA 2010 Proceedings: 2000–2007.

De Langhe, Rogier, Erik Weber, and Jeroen Van Bouwel. 2007. “A Pragmatist Approach To The Plurality Of Explanations In International Relations Theory”. In 6th Pan-European conference on international relations, Proceedings, 6th Pan-European conference on international relations, Proceedings, The Standing Group of International Relations of the ECPR. http://turin.sgir.eu/uploads/De%20Langhe-SGIR%20Rogier%20De%20Langhe%20-%20Erik%20Weber%20-%20Jeroen%20Van%20Bouwel.pdf.

Beirlaen, Mathieu, and Christian Straßer. 2011. “A Paraconsistent Multi-Agent Framework For Dealing With Normative Conflicts” Joao Leite, Torroni, Paolo, Agotnes, Thomas, Boella, Guido, and van der Torre, Leon. 12th International Workshop on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems (CLIMA XII): 312-329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22359-4.

Gauderis, Tjerk. 2012. “The Problem Of Multiple Explanatory Hypotheses” Lorenz Demey and Devuyst, Jonas. PhDs in Logic III: 45-53.

Batens, Diderik. 1999. “Paraconsistency And Its Relation To Worldviews”. Foundations of Science 3: 259–283.

Meheus, Joke. 2003. “Paraconsistent Compatibility”. Logique et Analyse 46: 251–287.

Batens, Diderik. 1980. “Paraconsistent Extensional Propositional Logics”. Logique et Analyse 23: 195–234.

Batens, Diderik. 1992. “Paraconsistente En Relevante Logica's”. Wijsgerig perspectief op maatschappij en wetenschap 32/2: 53–59.

Van Dyck, Maarten. 2005. “The Paradox Of Conceptual Novelty And Galileo's Use Of Experiments”. Philosophy of Science 72: 864–875. http://dx.doi.org/1854/10928.