<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Frederik Van De Putte</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">That will do: Logics of Deontic Necessity and Sufficiency</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Erkenntnis</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year></dates><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">82</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">473–511</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;table id=&quot;entry&quot; class=&quot;responsive&quot; style=&quot;margin-top: 10px;&quot;&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td class=&quot;pp-label&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td id=&quot;abstractElement&quot; class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;
&lt;div&gt;We study a logic for deontic necessity and sufficiency, as originally proposed in van Benthem :36–41, 1979). Building on earlier work in modal logic, we provide a sound and complete axiomatization for it, consider some standard extensions, and study other important properties. After that, we compare this logic to the logic of “obligation as weakest permission” from Anglberger et al. :807–827, 2015).&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</style></abstract></record></records></xml>