<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Urbaniak, Rafal</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Some non-standard interpretations of the axiomatic basis of Leś niewskis Ontology</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Australasian Journal of Logic</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">13–46</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;We propose an intuitive understanding of the statement: an ax-iom (or: an axiomatic basis) determines the meaning of the only specific constant occurring in it. We introduce some basic semantics for functors of the category &lt;sup&gt;s&lt;/sup&gt;⁄&lt;sub&gt;n,n&lt;/sub&gt; of Le´sniewskis Ontology. Using these results weprove that the popular claim that the axioms of Ontology determine themeaning of the primitive constants is false.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record></records></xml>