<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>13</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Batens, Diderik</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Orłowska, Ewa</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Inconsistency-Adaptive Logics</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Logic at Work. Essays Dedicated to the Memory of Helena Rasiowa</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1999</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Physica Verlag (Springer)</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Heidelberg, New York</style></pub-location><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">445–472</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;After a general description of adaptive logics and their intended applications, I study the proof theory and semantics of two closely related predicative inconsistency-adaptive logics, &lt;strong&gt;ACLuN1&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;ACLuN2&lt;/strong&gt;. To this end, I first describe their monotonic basis: the paraconsistent logic &lt;strong&gt;CLuN&lt;/strong&gt; obtained by dropping the consistency requirement from classical logic. The propositional fragments of these inconsistency-adaptive logics have been studied elsewhere. The predicative versions involve several interesting difficulties that lead to new results.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record></records></xml>