TY - JOUR T1 - Beyond consensus? A reply to Alan Irwin JF - SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY REVIEW AND REPLY COLLECTIVE Y1 - 2017 A1 - Van Bouwel, Jeroen A1 - Van Oudheusden, Michiel KW - democracy KW - disclosure KW - meta-consensus KW - public participation in science KW - scientific consensus VL - 6 SP - 48–53 ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Participation beyond consensus? Technology assessments, consensus conferences and democratic modulation. JF - Social Epistemology Y1 - 2017 A1 - Van Bouwel, Jeroen A1 - Van Oudheusden, Michiel AB -

In this article, we inquire into two contemporary participatory formats
that seek to democratically intervene in scientific practice: the consensus
conference and participatory technology assessment (pTA). We explain how
these formats delegitimize conflict and disagreement by making a strong
appeal to consensus. Based on our direct involvement in these formats and
informed both by political philosophy and science and technology studies,
we outline conceptions that contrast with the consensus ideal, including
dissensus, disclosure, conflictual consensus and agonistic democracy.
Drawing on the notion of meta-consensus and a distinction between
four models of democracy (aggregative, deliberative, participatory and
agonistic), we elaborate how a more positive valuation of conflict provides
opportunities for mutual learning, the articulation of disagreement, and
democratic modulation—three aspirations that are at the heart of most
pTAs and consensus conferences. Disclosing the strengths and weaknesses
of these different models is politically and epistemically useful, and should
therefore be an integral part of the development of participation theory and
process in science and technology.

VL - 31 (6) ER -