@incollection {2020639,
	title = {Can economics become a purely experimental science? {A} comparative study},
	booktitle = {Worldviews, science and us : bridging knowledge and its implications for our perspectives on the world},
	year = {2012},
	publisher = {World Scientific Publishing Company},
	abstract = {<p>The role of experiments in economics is increasing. This paper deals with a philosophical question that is raised by this evolution: can economics become a purely experimental science? I answer this question by comparing economics with a branch of biomedical science.</p>},
	isbn = {9789814383073},
	url = {http://www.worldscibooks.com/general/8341.html},
	author = {Weber, Erik},
	editor = {Aerts, Diederik and Broekaert, Jan and D{\textquoteright}Hooghe, Bart and Note, Nicole}
}
@incollection {Ducheyne2012,
	title = {History and Philosophy of Science: From Peaceful Coexistence to Golden Age of Interdisciplinarity?},
	booktitle = {Worldviews, Science and Us: Bridging Knowledge and its Implications for our Perpectives on the World.},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {26-36},
	publisher = {World Scientific Publishing Company},
	address = {Singapore},
	author = {Ducheyne, Steffen},
	editor = {Aerts, Diederik and Broekaert, Jan and D{\textquoteright}Hooghe, Bart and Note, Nicole}
}
@incollection {DeVreese2012,
	title = {An Interdisciplinary Focus on the Concept of Causation: What philosophy can learn from psychology},
	booktitle = {Worldviews, Science and Us: Bridging Knowledge and its Implications for our Perpectives on the World.},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {55-71},
	publisher = {World Scientific Publishing Company},
	address = {Singapore},
	abstract = {<p>In philosophy of science, it is still a mainstream practice to search for the {\textquoteleft}truth{\textquoteright} about fundamental scientific concepts in isolation, blind to knowledge achieved in other domains of science. I focus on the topic of causation. I argue that it is worthwhile for philosophy of science to leave its metaphysical tower in order to pick up knowledge from other domains where empirical research on causal reasoning is carried out, such as psychology. I will demonstrate what the psychologist Peter White{\textquoteright}s theory, on the origin and development of causal reasoning, can impart to philosophy of causation. It concerns different but interre- lated subjects with respect to the philosophy of causation: conceptual pluralism, a core causal concept of causation, the analysis of \what cau- sation is", epistemological pluralism, causation as a secondary quality and weak causal realism. The divide between metaphysical and epis- temological approaches to causation|and hence between philosophy and psychology|may be much smaller than is often presupposed. Keywords: philosophy of causation, developmental psychology, causal pluralism, interdisciplinarity</p>},
	author = {De Vreese, Leen},
	editor = {Aerts, Diederik and Broekaert, Jan and D{\textquoteright}Hooghe, Bart and Note, Nicole}
}
@incollection {Christiaens2012,
	title = {Metaphysics and Cinema},
	booktitle = {Worldviews, Science and Us: Bridging Knowledge and its Implications for our Perpectives on the World.},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {118-141},
	publisher = {World Scientific Publishing Company},
	address = {Singapore},
	author = {Christiaens, Wim},
	editor = {Aerts, Diederik and Broekaert, Jan and D{\textquoteright}Hooghe, Bart and Note, Nicole}
}
