@phdthesis {PhD_JanW,
	title = {And So On. Two Theories of Regress Arguments in Philosophy.},
	year = {2013},
	month = {February 25},
	publisher = {Ghent University},
	type = {phd},
	author = {Wieland, Jan Willem}
}
@article {924341,
	title = {Anti-positionalism{\textquoteright}s regress},
	journal = {Axiomathes},
	volume = {20},
	number = {4},
	year = {2010},
	pages = {479{\textendash}493},
	abstract = {<p>This paper is about the Problem of Order, which is basically the problem how to account for both the distinctness of facts like a{\textquoteright}s preceding b and b{\textquoteright}s preceding a, and the identity of facts like a{\textquoteright}s preceding b and b{\textquoteright}s succeeding a. It has been shown that the Standard View fails to account for the second part and is therefore to be replaced. One of the contenders is Anti-Positionalism. As has recently been pointed out, however, Anti-Positionalism falls prey to a regress argument which is to prove its failure. In the paper we spell out this worry, show that the worry is a serious one, and distinguish four possible strategies for Anti-Positionalism to deal with it.</p>},
	issn = {1122-1151},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10516-010-9097-9},
	author = {Wieland, Jan Willem}
}
