@proceedings {martens2012formal,
	title = {A formal approach to vague expressions with indexicals},
	journal = {Logic and Engineering of Natural Language Semantics 9 (LENLS 9-2012)},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {37-51},
	publisher = {Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence},
	abstract = {<p>In this paper, we offer a formal approach to the scantily investigated problem of vague expressions with indexicals, in particular including the spatial indexical {\textquoteleft}here{\textquoteright} and the temporal indexical {\textquoteleft}now{\textquoteright}. We present two versions of an adaptive fuzzy logic extended with an indexical, formally expressed by a modifier as a function that applies to predicative formulas. In the first version, such an operator is applied to non-vague predicates. The modified formulas may have a fuzzy truth value and fit into a Sorites paradox. We use adaptive fuzzy logics as a reasoning tool to address such a paradox. The modifier enables us to offer an adequate explication of the dynamic reasoning process. In the second version, a different result is obtained for an indexical applied to a formula with a possibly vague predicate, where the resulting modified formula has a crisp value and does not add up to a Sorites paradox.</p>},
	author = {Martens, Liesbeth and Primiero, Giuseppe}
}
@article {3145156,
	title = {Het debat tussen {\textquoteright}groene spellers{\textquoteright} en {\textquoteright}witte spellers{\textquoteright} ge{\"e}valueerd vanuit een sociaal-epistemologische invalshoek},
	journal = {Ethiek \& Maatschappij},
	volume = {14},
	number = {4},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {61{\textendash}78},
	abstract = {<p>In the Netherlands and Flanders, a debate on the Dutch spelling has been raging between, on the one hand, the green spellers, who follow the official green spelling, and, on the other hand, the protesting white spellers, who espouse an alternative spelling. In the present article, this debate will be approached from a socio-epistemological perspective. Using the theory of Helen Longino, we highlight how the debate between the parties has been conducted, and explain why it failed to become a fruitful debate, based on a critical discourse and by which both parties strive for objective knowledge. We also draw a few lessons for the future.</p>},
	issn = {1373-0975},
	author = {Martens, Liesbeth and Weber, Erik}
}
