@article {Ducheyne2008b,
	title = {Review of {F}lorian {E}beling{\textquoteright}s The Sectret History of Hermes},
	journal = {Annals of Science},
	volume = {66},
	number = {2},
	year = {2008},
	pages = {294{\textendash}295},
	author = {Ducheyne, Steffen}
}
@article {337658,
	title = {Reid{\textquoteright}s adaptation and radicalization of Newton{\textquoteright}s natural philosophy.},
	journal = {History of European Ideas},
	volume = {32},
	number = {2},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {173{\textendash}189},
	abstract = {<p>For Thomas Reid, Isaac Newton{\textquoteright}s scientific methodology in natural philosophy was a source of inspiration for philosophical methodology in general. I shall look at how Reid adapted Newton{\textquoteright}s views on methodology in natural philosophy. We shall see that Reid radicalized Newton{\textquoteright}s methodology (especially his view on causal explanation) and, thereby, begins to pave the way for the positivist movement, of which the origin is traditionally associated with the Frenchman Auguste Comte. In the Reidian adaptation of Newtonianism, we can already notice the beginnings of the anti-causal trend that would become so popular in the age of positivism.</p>},
	issn = {0191-6599},
	doi = {10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2006.02.001},
	author = {Ducheyne, Steffen}
}
@article {326990,
	title = {Review of {I}. {B}ernard {C}ohen and {G}eorge {E}. {S}mith ({E}{D}s.), The {C}ambridge companion to {N}ewton},
	journal = {PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE},
	volume = {72},
	number = {3},
	year = {2005},
	pages = {506{\textendash}508},
	issn = {0031-8248},
	author = {Ducheyne, Steffen}
}
