@article {Ducheyne2008a,
	title = {Conference Report "Induction: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, {G}hent {U}niversity, 810 July 2008"},
	journal = {The Reasoner},
	volume = {10},
	number = {2},
	year = {2008},
	pages = {8-9},
	author = {Ducheyne, Steffen}
}
@article {386240,
	title = {The Concept of Causation in {N}ewton{\textquoteright}s Mechanical and Optical Work},
	journal = {Logic and Logical Philosophy},
	volume = {16},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {265{\textendash}288},
	abstract = {<p>In this essay the authors explore the nature of efficient causal explanation in Newtons Principia and The Opticks. It is argued that: (1) In the dynamical explanations of the Principia, Newton treats the phenomena under study as cases of Halls second kind of atypical cau- sation. The underlying concept of causation is therefore a purely in- terventionist one. (2) In the descriptions of his optical experiments, Newton treats the phe- nomena under study as cases of Halls typical causation. The underly- ing concept of causation is therefore a mixed interventionist/mechani- cist one.</p>},
	issn = {1425-3305},
	author = {Ducheyne, Steffen and Weber, Erik}
}
@article {Ducheyne2005,
	title = {The Challenges for Early-Modern Philosophy: Editorial Introduction.},
	journal = {Philosophica},
	volume = {76},
	year = {2005},
	pages = {5-10},
	author = {Ducheyne, Steffen}
}
