@incollection {1890996,
	title = {What is there beyond Mertonian and dollar green science? {E}xploring the contours of epistemic democracy},
	booktitle = {Drunk on capitalism : an interdisciplinary reflection on market economy, art and science},
	volume = {11},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {35{\textendash}48},
	publisher = {Springer},
	abstract = {<p>The story is sometimes told as follows: Once science was a disinterested activity giving scientists the opportunity to freely solve the puzzle of nature to the benefit of all. Nowadays science seems more and more driven by the search for patents and dollars compelling scientists to follow the logic of capitalism and corporatization. Take-home lesson: science is for sale and we should do everything to reverse this evolution. In this contribution, I want to analyze the narrator{\textquoteright}s assumptions implicit in this account of science. In particular, the rosy description of earlier disinterested forms of scientific research will be questioned, as well as the lack of alternatives to the dichotomy disinterested versus corporatized. I will argue that beyond the dichotomy an interest-driven science can be conceived framed within an epistemic democracy.</p>},
	isbn = {9789400720817},
	author = {Van Bouwel, Jeroen},
	editor = {Vanderbeeken, Robrecht and Le Roy, Frederik and Stalpaert, Christel and Aerts, Diederik}
}
@incollection {909568,
	title = {What About Interdisciplinarity Within Philosophy?},
	booktitle = {Worldviews, Science and Us: Bridging Knowledge and Its Implications For Our Perspectives on the World},
	year = {2010},
	pages = {10{\textendash}25},
	publisher = {World Scientific Publishing Company},
	author = {Vanderbeeken, Robrecht},
	editor = {Aerts, Diederik}
}
@conference {812480,
	title = {Why social emergence? {D}iscussing the use of analytical metaphysics in social theory},
	booktitle = {Worldviews, science and us : studies of analytical metaphysics},
	year = {2010},
	publisher = {World Scientific Publishing Company},
	organization = {World Scientific Publishing Company},
	abstract = {<p>Recently the concept of emergence has been used in social theory to understand and defend social causation and nonreductive individualism (cf., Refs. 1, 2 and 3). In this paper, I want to analyse what the contribution of analytical metaphysics, and, in particular, the concept of emergence is, or might be, to the discussion in social theory. Especially Keith Sawyer{\textquoteright}s use of emergence in his defence of social explanation will be scrutinized. Therefore, it will be important to distinguish ontological from epistemological emergence. Where Sawyer focuses on ontological emergence, I will argue that social explanation might better be defended by putting emphasis on pragmatic aspects of explanation and considering emergence as an epistemological category.</p>},
	isbn = {9789814295819},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789814299053\_0010},
	author = {Van Bouwel, Jeroen},
	editor = {Vanderbeeken, Robrecht and D{\textquoteright}Hooghe, Bart}
}
