@conference {524726,
	title = {Trading off explanatory virtues},
	booktitle = {Logic, Philosophy and History of Science in Belgium. Proceedings of the Young Researchers Days},
	year = {2009},
	publisher = {{Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van Belgi{\"e}},
	organization = {{Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van Belgi{\"e}},
	abstract = {<p>The paper draws on Graham Allison{\textquoteright}s case-study of the Cuban Missile Crisis in which three different accounts are constructed from three different explanatory models, each situated at a different level of analysis. First, it is shown that each model produces genuine explanations which could not have been arrived at from one of the other accounts. With this prima facie case for pluralism in hand, the indispensability of the different models is then accounted for by linking the relevance of each model to different explanatory contexts.</p>},
	author = {De Langhe, Rogier},
	editor = {Weber, Erik and Libert, Thierry and Marage, Pierre and Van Paemel, Geert}
}
@article {531119,
	title = {Is there no alternative?},
	journal = {Ethiek en Maatschappij},
	volume = {10},
	number = {4},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {101{\textendash}111},
	issn = {1373-0975},
	url = {http://logica.ugent.be/rogier/alternative.pdf},
	author = {De Langhe, Rogier}
}
