@phdthesis {PhD_Rogier,
	title = {Models in Science: Essays on Scientific Virtues, Scientific Pluralism and the Distribution of Labour in Science},
	year = {2010},
	month = {April 19},
	publisher = {Ghent University},
	type = {phd},
	author = {De Langhe, Rogier}
}
@article {663049,
	title = {Mainstream economics: searching where the light is},
	journal = {JOURNAL OF POST KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS},
	volume = {32},
	number = {1},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {137{\textendash}150},
	abstract = {<p>The starting point of this paper is the question of how to explain mainstream economics{\textquoteright} great level of acceptance in the face of its poor empirical track record. An explanation is provided in terms of a combination of unification and, most importantly, inference to the best explanation. This paper asks whether the appeal of mainstream economics to inference to the best explanation is justified and as a consequence questions one of the main reasons for the dominance of mainstream economics today. The final section integrates the ideas from the previous sections into a general framework for explanatory pluralism.</p>},
	issn = {0160-3477},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/PKE0160-3477320109},
	author = {De Langhe, Rogier}
}
@conference {531125,
	title = {Mainstream economics: searching where the light is},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 10th Anniversary Conference of the Association of Heterodox Economics},
	year = {2008},
	month = {July},
	publisher = {Anglia Ruskin University},
	organization = {Anglia Ruskin University},
	author = {De Langhe, Rogier}
}
